feat: let admins configure managed skill and marketplace controls#21413
Open
viyatb-oai wants to merge 1 commit intocodex/viyatb/managed-plugin-entrypointsfrom
Open
feat: let admins configure managed skill and marketplace controls#21413viyatb-oai wants to merge 1 commit intocodex/viyatb/managed-plugin-entrypointsfrom
viyatb-oai wants to merge 1 commit intocodex/viyatb/managed-plugin-entrypointsfrom
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: cc70905d44
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
30b7766 to
5bc2238
Compare
51ff359 to
0427128
Compare
9e470f0 to
42e8036
Compare
This was referenced May 7, 2026
42e8036 to
f0f0058
Compare
9b4c779 to
294f4f9
Compare
f0f0058 to
c12e95e
Compare
Co-authored-by: Codex noreply@openai.com
294f4f9 to
c7e7818
Compare
c12e95e to
4ea99de
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Enterprise admins need a managed contract for the extensibility surfaces they may restrict, but that public surface should become usable only after the enforcement path exists. The lower PRs in this stack add the internal model and runtime enforcement first; this final PR activates the managed config surface and exposes it through cloud/app-server APIs.
What changed
Made the managed requirement sections parseable from local and cloud-managed requirements:
Threaded the new fields through the shared requirements TOML model and exhaustive config fixtures.
Exposed the new managed requirements through
configRequirements/read.Regenerated the app-server protocol JSON and TypeScript schemas for the new response fields.
Updated the app-server README example to include the managed artifact requirements.
Example
config.tomlWith the managed requirements above, an approved marketplace can still appear in user
config.tomllike this:There is intentionally no user-writable
allowed_sourceskey inconfig.toml; skill-source restrictions are enforced only from managed requirements.Verification
codex-rs/config/src/config_requirements.rs.codex-rs/cloud-requirements/src/lib.rs.codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol/v2/tests.rs.Stack
--> feat: let admins configure managed skill and marketplace controls #21413: managed artifact requirements activation