Repository navigation
Conversation
The API replays a completed request's status and body for 1 hour on Messaging writes and campaign lifecycle actions, and answers 422 idempotency_conflict for key reuse. Update the README, command research notes and flag help text. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reachedThe included review limit has been reached and this organization has disabled usage-based review continuation. Wait for reviews to reset or ask a billing admin to change After included review limits.
Reviews can continue after your included limit without a manual trigger. An admin must approve usage-based billing. Next included review available in 5 minutes. View limit details
|
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: db3a4a5870
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Please perform the exhaustive current-head code review required by the human's November 5 merge policy, including all changed source and contract/consumer boundaries. The branch has been integrated with its actual immediate parent. Old-head green evidence does not qualify this head. Extra local validation was explicitly waived; producer results and remaining availability/security/legal gates are stated in the PR body. |
|
@codex security review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
🛡️ Codex Security ReviewSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
@codex review Exhaustive final-head review requested for f5df1c7 after actual source repairs, parent integration and genuine producer updates. Please include every changed source/contract boundary and all review bodies. Earlier findings have source-specific dispositions; old-head results do not qualify this head. API/Docs/marketing are one dependent stack and will merge only as a complete qualified family. Extra local validation was waived by the human; no release or retention exception is granted. |
purpshell
changed the title
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
@codex review Current checked head: 92356f1. Please cover the complete current change and all outside-diff/prior finding dispositions for the human's final code/security gate. Required relevant checks passed before publication. Earlier-head results remain historical; there is no merge, package or deployment waiver. |
|
@codex security review Current checked head: 92356f1. Please cover the complete current change and all outside-diff/prior finding dispositions for the human's final code/security gate. Required relevant checks passed before publication. Earlier-head results remain historical; there is no merge, package or deployment waiver. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next? Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
Summary
Integrates actual main, fixes all eight stale retry-window help descriptions, preserves outcome reconciliation before changing a key, and regenerates the real command reference. The source binding records API #890 and SDK #369. No automatic retry, key rearm or provider/financial effect is added. A narrow dependency repair also clears the real production audit failure.
Impact
No impact table
Verification
Before committing the dependency repair, the complete relevant
npm run verifypassed: formatting, lint, typechecking, all 118 test files and 1,164 tests, current build, reference/browser checks, package dry run and production audit. The production audit now reports no vulnerabilities. The real command reference producer still emits 381 commands without artifact drift.The failed hosted job reached the production audit after its tests passed. A narrow patched matcher override fixes the reported advisory without downgrading the CLI framework or suppressing the audit. Fresh current-head hosted CI and exhaustive Codex/security reviews remain required before the whole family merges.
Session provenance and UI evidence
Continued by the same existing Codex source owner. Historical authored commits and their author attribution are preserved. The old source/index/rebase and private artifacts remain retained separately; historical preservation receipts describe their original snapshots, not the current checkout. Full historical transcript/registration reconciliation remains incomplete and is not represented as complete. Current producer and source-binding evidence is recorded in the owning release/contract records and the private November 5 continuation evidence. Extra local validation was waived by the human; no browser inspection or new screenshots are claimed.
Rollout and rollback
Source only. Merge the complete qualified family together after all required gates; do not publish packages or deploy from this work. Revert the owning changes for rollback, preserving execution fences and applied history.
Stack navigation
Native stack #956: #890 API → #892 Docs → #893 Marketing. Separate companions: SDK #369, CLI #94.