Clarity improvement in magnifier naming#20281
Draft
Boumtchack wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@CyrilleB79 I started rewritting the user docs and I'll do the same in the settings when #19913 is closed. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to issue number:
Closes #20126
Summary of the issue:
At the moment, the magnifier module lacks clarity in naming, it uses several terms to talk about the same things and that can lead to confusions
Description of user facing changes:
Users will have a better and clearer desciption and settings of the magnifier
Description of developer facing changes:
Variables and naming will be more consistent and logical
Description of development approach:
Adapting code naming to the User guide terms
Testing strategy:
Known issues with pull request:
Code Review Checklist: