[Duang777]

Summary

new scope alias         retained scope
src//main.ts      ->    src/./main.ts
        |                         |
        +---- canonical comparison src/main.ts ----+
                              |
                    write_scope_conflict

Malformed retained scope strings compare as ** without rewriting the stored lease. Acquisition identity retains the original request spellings; new lease contents and conflict checks use the canonical scope set. Glob character classes share the matcher's boundary parser.

Evidence

• Before: src//main.ts and src/./main.ts did not overlap, so two ordinary same-repository leases could be admitted.
• After: aliases canonicalize to one relative scope and conflict; malformed historical scopes conservatively block new acquisition.

Merge Danger

Door: two-way

The change only normalizes lexical equivalents for lease admission and comparison. Reverting restores the former matching behavior.

Blast Radius: coordination

Goal And Delivered Outcome

• Outcome basis / optional anchor: Reproduced hard-lease conflict bypass.
• Goal/source and gap: equivalent repository-relative path spellings evaded the task-lease overlap check, allowing competing same-repository leases.
• Observable before -> after, with validation: src//main.ts and src/./main.ts previously returned no overlap; they now conflict before provider access.
• Issue/task and intended base: no existing issue or open PR found. Base: main at 09e47b0.

Author Declaration

• Written by: Codex, OpenAI, with user-authorized implementation and submission.

Implemented against

• Specification and revision: canonical lease contract at 09e47b0, sections Repository-relative scope identity, Commit, retry and readback, and Revising declared work requirements. This revision also documents lexical scope comparison in that owner.
• Criteria:

Criterion	Disposition	Symbol / path	Test or command
Equivalent relative scopes cannot bypass exclusive lease conflicts	implemented	task_lease_acquire_decision.ts	task_lease_workspace.test.ts
New lease requests reject noncanonical backslash scopes before provider access	implemented	task_lease_acquire.ts	task_lease_acquire.test.ts
Legacy lease bytes remain unchanged while malformed scopes fail closed for comparison	implemented	task_lease_state.ts	task_lease_workspace.test.ts

• Self-check before submission: reviewed the full PR diff and the request/receipt, Todo declaration and glob consumers. Reproduced the reported regressions on a736571, replayed requests produced by 09e47b0 through the repaired CLI, and verified the frozen committed head on File, SQLite and isolated PostgreSQL.

Scope And Continuation

• Completed scope and remaining work: complete within task-lease admission and conflict comparison.
• Slice boundary / successor: Python task-orchestration scope matching uses a separate owner and remains outside this task-lease PR.

Review follow-up

This head repairs the three reported regressions while retaining the motivating alias-conflict fix:

• F1: original acquire receipt identity: retain original request spellings in the hash. Exact base-produced requests recover the same receipt before and after renewal, return current proof, and do not add another lease or event. Changing the original spelling under the same key remains a different request.
• F2: accepted Todo declarations: validate retained spellings before deriving the canonical lease set. Both retained declarations and ordinary public add -> claim work with equivalent scopes, without rewriting the declaration.
• F3: complete glob character classes: normalization and matching share initial literal-right-bracket and negation handling. Slash/dot class members retain their coverage and conflicting public acquisitions are rejected.

Historical receipt decoding remains strict: malformed scope evidence cannot become a root wildcard through the conservative conflict-comparison fallback. The prior CHANGES_REQUESTED review is historical; the new head requires independent review.

Validation

• Tested revision: b61bc6a7e0aadc16d3801560e79448e3ee09f27e.
• Integration baseline: main at 659c1fd; merged normally into the feature branch, preserving published history.
• Run state: finished.
• Input classes: synthetic.

Check kind	Result	Public-safe evidence / limitation
regression_parity	passed	a736571 reproduces the old-request identity mismatch, alias-declaration rejection and character-class loss. File/SQLite requests produced by 09e47b0 replay through the new CLI before and after renewal with the immutable original receipt and current proof.
real_entrypoint	passed	12 new File/SQLite CLI cases cover cross-version replay, retained declarations, ordinary add -> claim and literal-right-bracket/negated-class exclusive conflicts.
unit	passed	59 selected Python lease tests passed.
integration	passed	Frozen-head PostgreSQL 16.15 in a disposable local container plus seven relevant TypeScript suites: 504 passed, zero failures or skips.
regression_parity	passed	Removing only the receipt-scope validation makes both File and SQLite malformed-receipt cases fail; restoring it rejects the evidence without changing provider state.
static	passed	Control-plane TypeScript typecheck, Ruff and mypy.
static	passed	Frozen-head standard diff canary passed direct checks, 9 catalog checks, 8 risk-profile smokes and the selected public-boundary scan.
static	failed	An earlier canary run detected author edits made during its source check. That run was discarded; the frozen-head rerun passed.
integration	blocked	Full-tree validation still has the known main digest-owner failure, repaired separately in #7209. Its exact old TypeScript failure is confirmed in this PR's historical CI.
integration	blocked	The previous remote head also failed dashboard-browser (2); the same analysis-panel failure is reproduced on latest main and is being investigated independently. Remote CI and exact-head review must rerun for this head.

• Coverage and gaps: Real File/SQLite CLI checks cover the three new counterexamples and no-write rejection/replay behavior. PostgreSQL integration qualifies the shared provider suite, not individual CLI counterexamples on PostgreSQL. No production state, installed app, real model, GUI layout or benchmark-cost claim is made. Full Python and full TypeScript suites were not rerun locally for this follow-up; required remote CI remains authoritative.

Frontend / Visual Evidence

• UI impact: none.
• Before: N/A.
• After: N/A.
• First viewport and preview: N/A. This is a control-plane lease rule, so screenshots are not applicable.
• States and viewports shown: N/A.
• Source data: none.
• Attention review: N/A.
• Craft review: N/A.

Type of Change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Breaking change
• Refactoring (no functional changes)
• Documentation update
• Test update

LoopX Area

• Control plane (goals, todos, quota, scheduler, registry, runtime)
• Benchmark boundary (adapters, runners, verifiers, scoring, evidence)
• Capability or extension (providers, adapters, skills)
• Public docs or presentation surface (README, protocols, dashboard)
• Build, packaging, installer, or CI
• Host or runtime integration

Technical Direction

• Direction / acceptance reference, when applicable: Core control-plane hardening.

Shared-authority RFC fixture impact

• N/A. This preserves provider-neutral lease semantics and does not change fixture schema, provider capacity, or retention policy.

Boundary Checklist

• Neither the diff nor this PR body/comments/attachments disclose private state, credentials, raw traces or verifier output, internal links, or local machine paths.
• I did not duplicate maintainer-owned benchmark work.
• I kept the change scoped to the reproduced defect.
• No paired RFC changed, and the local bilingual RFC check passed.
• UI impact is none, so screenshots are not applicable.
• Every commit includes a DCO Signed-off-by trailer.

[loopx-agent]

动机

REQUEST_CHANGES：当前精确提交 a7365711bc3be3dda22a92988a6bb57fff1da9dc 有三处可复现回归，详见后面的 F1–F3。原别名漏洞确实修复，以下问题不能由这个正例或常规测试通过抵消。

通过 CLI 为仓库任务领取独占写租约、升级后恢复原执行，或从 Todo 声明直接领取工作的调用者。 例如两个任务分别写 src//main.ts 与 src/./main.ts，原实现会发出两笔租约；本提交能拦住这对别名，却同时让旧请求重放和正常 Todo 领取失败，并新增一类 glob 漏拦。 独立真实入口既验证了预期冲突修复，也验证了三个新回归，因此当前提交仍需修改后再验收。 本评审不要求重做整个路径权限系统、引入新 scope 协议或完成父级迁移；不授予合并、安装、跨 Goal 锁或实际文件访问权限。

作者写“无现成规格”，但仓库已有已接受的租约契约：spec_ref docs/reference/canonical-lease-renew.md，spec_revision 09e47b0e2ed990681b007c031efae385b73df1a3（固定版本）。本次使用原文真实节名作为 criterion_id：Repository-relative scope identity 规定普通同仓库重叠排他，Commit, retry and readback 规定原请求身份/回执及当前执行证明，Revising declared work requirements 区分实际声明修订与不变工作。它们分别受 F3、F1、F2 影响，未引入新的 roadmap 门槛。

改动思路

TS 现有租约 owner 是正确放置点，但共享 normalizeWriteScopes 同时改变了比较值、历史请求 digest 和 Todo 数量校验；这三个消费边界不能被当成同一种规范化。新增字符类扫描还与同文件 classMatch 的语法分叉。 当前 PR 应保留同仓库别名冲突修复，并在同一 owner 内修复旧回执重放、add→claim 声明一致性和 glob 字符类边界；不需要新协议、存储迁移或另建权限层。

保留现状会继续让相同文件的别名逃过排他检查，另加一套权限系统或改写历史也没有必要。需要收敛的是派生比较、不可变身份和声明有效性各自的职责。比较时规范化不代表可以改已有请求的 hash；输入数组规范化去重也不等于历史声明损坏；解析路径分隔符必须先正确识别完整 glob 字符类。这个修复仍可在原有几个 owner 内完成。

下面是源码导出的比较表，用于说明消费边界，并非执行证据；未另作 Mermaid 渲染验收。

输入/消费边界	base	当前 head
普通相对路径别名冲突	错误发出第二笔租约	正确拒绝第二笔
base 已提交的原参数重试	返回原回执与有效执行	错报请求身份不同
普通 Todo 的两种等价 scope 声明	可直接领取	add 成功，claim 报声明损坏
具有字面量 ] 的字符类	保留原匹配集并拒绝冲突	改变匹配集并允许冲突

具体改动

关键代码讲解

canonicalWriteScope 去掉路径中的空段和独立 .，保留末尾目录斜杠；comparisonWriteScopes 为保留记录构造比较视图，无法解析的历史 scope 以 ** 保守比较，原记录不回写。现有同仓库/生效 holder/worktree 分支仍由原决策器负责。这个放置本身合理，字符类的结束位置却与下方已有 classMatch 不一致。

normalizeWriteScopes 改为规范化后再去重，requireWriteScopes 增加新输入严格拒绝。它既被独立 acquire 使用，也被原 coordinationTodoWriteScopes 消费。后者继续用数组长度变化判断损坏，导致正确的词法归并被误当成无效声明。独立 acquire 又在建立不可变请求身份前先规范化，触发不同的持久兼容性问题。

F1 [P1] 保留旧 acquire 请求的原始回执身份 — 入口 L36。File/SQLite：base 用 src//main.ts 首次 acquire，再按同一 key/expected-version=0/TTL/scope 重放成功；同一物理 provider 不变交给 head，完全原参数却 exit1/coordination_operation_identity_mismatch，原租约仍 active。 这里新调用先把 scope 改为 src/main.ts，随后未改的 request_sha256 计算自然与旧回执不同。不是调用者改了意图，也不是执行已退休；inspect 仍返回完全原样的 active lease。需要把比较/新记录规范化与既有请求身份分开，保证旧生产者→新消费者的原参数重试仍能恢复不可变原回执及当前有效证明，不能靠删除回执或要求换新执行绕过。

F2 [P2] 声明生产者与领取使用一致的等价规则 — 共享规范化 L254。File/SQLite：原 required_write_scopes=[src//main.ts, src/./main.ts] 在 base 可原子 claim/acquire，在 head 返回 invalid_coordination_task_lease。head 自己的普通 todo add 也能合法保存这两个别名，紧接着 claim 即失败，拒绝前后 canonical 状态不变。 两个合法字符串在这里归并成一个，而 unchanged coordinationTodoWriteScopes 看到长度从2变1就抛出损坏错误。本轮还通过 head 自己的普通 todo add --required-write-scope src//main.ts --required-write-scope src/./main.ts 实际创建记录，紧接着正常 claim 就失败，因此不只是人工构造的历史情况。修复应贯通声明生产与消费，保留既有有效 Todo；不应让用户为同一工作额外修订一次 scope 才能执行。

F3 [P2] 使用匹配器的完整字符类边界 — 扫描 L88。File/SQLite：合法 glob src/[]/./]x 匹配 src/.x，base 拒绝第二笔独占租约；head 把原 glob 存成 src/[]/]x 后准许第二笔，两个同仓库 active lease 同时存在。 已有 classMatch 支持字符类开头的字面量 ]，新扫描却把它当成闭合括号。于是字符类里面的 /./ 被当成路径段折叠，. 成员丢失。这不是等价路径规范化，而是改变 glob 覆盖文件集合；只测 [./]、[//] 的字符串输出抓不住它。需要复用匹配语法的括号边界，补字面量右括号、否定类及类内 slash/dot 的真实排他回归。

真实 File/SQLite CLI 证实原漏洞：base 可先后给 src/./main.ts 和 src//main.ts 两个同仓库任务发租约，head 在第二次领取时返回 write_scope_conflict，源状态不变。 独立 33 个 Python 单测、56 个既有真实入口测试通过；12 个相关 TS 文件 181 passed/6 PostgreSQL optional skipped；typecheck 通过；标准 premerge 5 direct、9 catalog/8 risk 共17 selected 通过。另启动隔离真实 PostgreSQL16.15，完整 authority-store integration 369 passed/0 skipped，容器已 finally 清理；该套件不替代本轮新 File/SQLite 反例。 这说明通用存储和原来的测试场景仍能运行，不能证明新增边界正确；三个阻断问题均经真实 CLI→原生 owner→独立 provider 读回复现，没有用 mock 预置结论。

对主干的风险

F1 使丢响应/升级后的合法继续被当成另一请求；F2 让正常声明到执行的既有旅程增加无必要的 owner 重录；F3 则在本应排他的同文件工作上发出第二笔租约。范围限定于对应输入与共享租约语义，不称为文件系统越权或跨 Goal 锁问题。拒绝场景的 canonical 源、显示和 registry 均独立验证未变；glob 漏拦则实际观察到两笔 active lease。

既有 owner 可以 inspect、按原 proof release 后重新获取；把声明显式修订成单个规范 scope 后也能领取。这些真实 File/SQLite 恢复均已执行，但属于额外操作，不能冒充原重放保证或原有 add→claim 路径恢复正常。回滚整个 PR 又会恢复原别名漏拦，因此建议保留原正向修复，在同一 owner 内修三个消费边界。

语义与 CI 对齐

当前义务来自上述固定契约，触发点、观察、最小修复与重跑范围已在 F1–F3 说明。修复后应重跑原生公开 File/SQLite 原生产者/新消费者、普通 add→claim、glob 持有者→目标的对照，再跑相关 lease suites、实际 PostgreSQL integration 和标准 premerge；不以只改码或放宽断言结清。digest-owner 定向检查在不可变 base 和 exact head 同为16过1失败，完整对象同为 trajectory_input_usage.ts:24 /^[a-f0-9]{64}$/；因果文件和检查器逐字节相同，属于 pre_existing_unrelated，不要求本 PR 修复或放宽。 它与本 PR 新回归分开，不能拿旧全库失败否定新问题，也不能把本轮局部全绿写成全库全绿。

初私有评审 runner 漏建临时目录、误给 agent Todo add 加 --agent-id、按未加优先级的文字查新 Todo，被原有契约正确拒绝；纠正为正常 authoring 参数和真实返回 ID 后才用于结论。初 PostgreSQL runner 在镜像初始化临时 socket 就绪时取版本，撞到临时服务关闭；改为最终 TCP 服务就绪后正常跑完并清理，原失败保留，没有跳过检查。未执行本轮全库套件、实际生产升级、真实模型、Windows/最低Node版本或长期成本实验；新增三个回归直接在 File/SQLite 复现，未声称对 PostgreSQL逐条重演。未读取或等待远端 CI。

我的整体评价

原漏洞值得修，生产四文件净增79行和现有 typed owner 的选址并非本轮阻断理由。必要的同域收敛是把比较语义、持久身份与声明校验分清，并复用已有字符类语法；无需借机加版本协议、改外部权限或扩成另一套路径系统。当前同一进程版本内的单测通过，不等于跨版本原回执和普通生产者/消费者已兼容。

检查既有 CLI add/claim/acquire/readback 及完整七文件 diff，未改变渲染页面、控件或可见布局；问题在现有旅程的后端准入和恢复。 未做 GUI 截图或页面可读性验收；未把后端修复等同完整协作 UI 资格。 原来已有意图和授权时，用户只需原请求重试或声明后领取；当前额外 release/new execution、重录 scope 并不缺用户新决定，应由实现消除。建议修复三项并用同样反例重新核验后再批准；本次不合并或安装。

English verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES a7365711bc3be3dda22a92988a6bb57fff1da9dc. The motivating alias conflict is fixed, but real File/SQLite CLI checks reproduce three regressions: old exact acquisition retries fail after normalization, ordinary accepted Todo declarations cannot be claimed, and a valid character class is changed so a conflicting second exclusive lease is admitted. Preserve original receipt identity, align producer/admission validation, and share the existing glob grammar. Passing local/premerge and real PostgreSQL tests do not cover these counterexamples.

Reviewer: model_agent; gpt-6.1-sol; OpenAI; runtime_reported; reasoning_effort=max.

[loopx-agent]

[P1] 保留旧租约 acquire 请求的原始回执身份

File/SQLite：base 用 src//main.ts 首次 acquire，再按同一 key/expected-version=0/TTL/scope 重放成功；同一物理 provider 不变交给 head，完全原参数却 exit1/coordination_operation_identity_mismatch，原租约仍 active。 Separate comparison/new-record canonicalization from frozen historical request/receipt identity. Recover the existing original request and current proof without changing its immutable receipt or requiring a new execution. Create the lease with immutable base through real CLI on File/SQLite, then replay exact same key, expected0, TTL and original scope on head, also after renewal; require original_receipt unchanged/current generation returned and no extra event or lease.

[loopx-agent]

[P2] 让 Todo 声明与领取对等价 scope 使用一致规则

File/SQLite：原 required_write_scopes=[src//main.ts, src/./main.ts] 在 base 可原子 claim/acquire，在 head 返回 invalid_coordination_task_lease。head 自己的普通 todo add 也能合法保存这两个别名，紧接着 claim 即失败，拒绝前后 canonical 状态不变。 Align producer and admission validation without treating lexical deduplication as corruption of a valid declaration. Preserve legacy declarations and ordinary add->claim; do not require the owner to rewrite unchanged work simply to acquire it. Exercise ordinary todo add with both aliases, then hard-lease claim on File/SQLite, plus a base-produced retained Todo; assert useful claim succeeds with semantic scope coverage and no extra manual declaration revision.

[loopx-agent]

[P2] 识别字符类开头的字面量右括号

File/SQLite：合法 glob src/[]/./]x 匹配 src/.x，base 拒绝第二笔独占租约；head 把原 glob 存成 src/[]/]x 后准许第二笔，两个同仓库 active lease 同时存在。 Reuse the matching grammar for character-class boundaries, including an initial literal ] and optional !. Do not collapse path separators or dot tokens inside the class; retain its matching set. Real File/SQLite public acquire with the original glob and literal target must reject the second lease; add parser/overlap cases for literal ], negation and slash/dot membership.

[loopx-agent]

Reviewer: model_agent · gpt-6.1-sol · OpenAI · runtime_reported · reasoning_effort=max

APPROVE — 当前精确 head b61bc6a7e0aadc16d3801560e79448e3ee09f27e，集成基线 659c1fd441abf5bd9171f22d9a84981497856a63。原 F1–F3 已通过独立真实入口复验；旧错误与旧评审保留为历史，不继承其结论。

动机

通过 CLI 领取同仓库独占租约、从普通 Todo 声明领取工作，以及升级/续租后重试原请求的调用者。

src//main.ts 与 src/./main.ts 原来逃过同仓库排他；前一 head 修正比较却破坏原回执、合法声明及带字面量 ] 的 glob。本 head 分开不可变原拼写与派生比较，并共用完整字符类边界。 原别名漏洞确实需要修复，但修复不能让调用者为同一项工作重录声明、删除回执或重新开始执行。本次用原合同与原三个反例分别判断，未把作者测试或新 head 本身当作解决证明。

独立真实入口确认：原请求在升级、续租后恢复原回执，普通合法声明直接领取，完整字符类覆盖和原别名互斥同时正确；调用者不必重录已知要求或重启原执行。

范围仍是既有租约准入和恢复，不新增文件访问权限、跨 Goal 锁、provider、协议、UI、模型执行或生产升级，也不授合并权。

实际 Windows、安装 App、真实模型采用与长期完整成本未在本轮认证；六个可选 TS PostgreSQL case 保留跳过，另行通过的369项真实 PostgreSQL integration 不冒充这些 case 的执行。

修改前先读 canonical lease contract和原评审全部正文、三个 inline；规范固定为 09e47b0e2ed990681b007c031efae385b73df1a3。三个真实节名 Repository-relative scope identity、Commit, retry and readback、Revising declared work requirements 分别要求有效覆盖互斥、原请求与当前证明兼容、合法声明不被当成实际工作修订。本 head 对三项均已实现；不是靠本次新增文档定义自己的验收。

改动思路

复用既有 TS lease decision/state/receipt owner：原请求 normalize 保留字符串身份；canonicalWriteScope/comparisonWriteScopes只派生新记录和比较；requireWriteScopes在新输入入口严格验证；characterClassEnd由规范化和匹配共用。 原有 typed owner 足够，无需新协议、存储迁移、全局锁或物理路径权限层。同一个字符串在请求身份、工作声明和冲突比较中的责任不同；只让派生比较和新记录使用规范集合，才能同时修复漏拦与过度拒绝。

当前新增的两语合同文字准确说明原拼写与比较值的区别。新输入中的反斜杠、越级或非相对 token 会严格拒绝，不再静默过滤；损坏的历史 scope 仅在冲突比较中保守视为 **，不会被改写成真实根权限，也不能作为有效历史回执复用。独立工作树提示、同 checkout 排他、仓库未知时保守互斥等原边界保持。

具体改动

关键代码讲解

• canonicalWriteScope / comparisonWriteScopes 在原决策 owner 中折叠空段和独立 .；characterClassEnd 与原 matcher 共用初始字面量 ] 和可选 ! 的解析，字符类中的 slash/dot 不再被误当路径段。新记录规范化，保留记录只生成比较视图。
• normalizeWriteScopes / requireWriteScopes 保留合法原拼写，避免两个等价声明归并后被旧长度校验误判损坏；严格入口先拒绝非法新输入。
• executeCanonicalTaskLeaseAcquire 用原始合法字符串计算冻结 digest，解码回执时先拒绝坏 scope，再比较语义覆盖；原 receipt/current-proof owner 继续核验 key、版本、epoch、资格和退役。它不会用比较等价性接受同一 key 下改过的原参数。
• canonicalTaskLeaseAcquireFacts 从完整 canonical head 提取比较 scopes，不重写旧 lease，也不依赖 Todo 列表或展示页。

完整 10 文件 +408/-31：产品四个 TS 文件 +119/-30，合同12行，五个测试文件 +277/-1。后续测试针对三个实际消费边界、原路径及损坏回执拒绝，并非增加另一套产品 owner。新共享解析函数是适用的同域收敛；task-orchestration 的另一套语义仍保持原范围，不扩成本 PR 的迁移工程。

对主干的风险

独立脚本使用原 09e47b0、前一坏 head a736571 和当前 head，通过 94 次真实 CLI 调用记录40行比较；全部使用隔离真实 File/SQLite、普通生产 owner 和独立源读回，没有 mock 预置成功。

原反例	当前独立结果
F1 原生产者的原 acquire 请求	同一物理 provider 上，旧坏 head 仍报 identity mismatch；当前升级前后均恢复完整原回执。真实续租后返回当前 version2/epoch1，原 receipt 不变、无额外 lease/event；改拼写同 key 和已释放执行仍拒绝。
F2 原声明与普通 add→claim	原 base 与当前普通 add 都保存两个合法别名；坏 head 仍拒绝 claim，当前正常领取，声明原样保留而新 lease 存一个规范 scope，无额外 owner 修订。
F3 完整字符类	字面量 ]、否定类、类内 slash/dot 的原覆盖恢复；应冲突的目标均拒绝，否定类排除的无关目标仍可领取。原词法别名漏拦也继续被修复。

另经真实 CLI 复验：同 Goal/仓库的无关 docs scope 可以执行；伪造或删除旧展示不会改变 canonical 冲突，完整拒绝结果相同；由真正持有者按 proof 释放后，原先被拒的目标获得新 active lease 并独立 inspect。十个非法新 scope 输入拒绝且源状态不变。这些结果同时检查“漏拦”和“过度拒绝”，读回或拒绝本身不被当作恢复完成。

独立 87 Python passed；12个相关 TS 文件 184 passed / 6 optional PostgreSQL skipped；隔离真实 PostgreSQL16.15 integration 369 passed / 0 skipped，容器已清理。PG suite 不冒充上述六个可选 case 或逐条服务端 CLI 反例的执行。Typecheck、Ruff、标准 native premerge 5 direct / 18 selected（9 catalog、8 risk、1 public boundary）全部通过。最新 target main 7a03792090abb44850109cb6f6d93219c63e555e 在四个产品 owner 上与本 PR base 相同。未查询或等待远端 CI；旧 head 的其它 CI/全树失败不被本次局部通过改写。

我的整体评价

当前完整提案可批准：原漏洞与三个公开回归在同一 owner 内一起修复，原请求、合法工作与真实错误都能沿原路径继续，无需额外用户决定或确认。原评审中要求的修复条件已逐条取得当前 exact-head 证据，仍需分别完成原生审批收尾与合并就绪检查；批准本身不授合并权。

检查既有 CLI、完整 diff 与消费者，未修改渲染页面、布局或控件，视觉证据不适用。本次是既有准入/恢复旅程的修复，不是完整协作 UI、物理文件权限、跨 Goal 锁、生产升级或长期模型收益认证。经验提示只用于普通工作→失败→恢复→读回的判断，没有据此增加无关 rollout 门或声称 memory 效益。

English verdict: APPROVE — b61bc6a7e0aadc16d3801560e79448e3ee09f27e. All three prior regressions are repaired through real File/SQLite CLI: immutable old requests/receipts survive upgrade and renewal, ordinary declarations claim without revision, and complete glob-class coverage is preserved. The motivating alias exclusion and opposite nonoverlap/recovery cases pass.87 Python and184 TypeScript tests pass;6 optional TS PostgreSQL cases remain skipped, while the separate real PostgreSQL16.15 integration passes369 with zero skips. Native premerge and type/lint pass; no CI, production upgrade or merge is claimed.