Skip to content

docs(grading-tiers): describe the study data and scripts without local paths #748

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
xaleryb wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs(grading-tiers): describe the study data and scripts without local paths #748

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
2dbc367
docs(grading-tiers): describe the study data and scripts without loca…
xaleryb Nov 14, 2026
5edabca
Re-flow the Reproducing paragraph in grading-tiers
antonwolfy Nov 14, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 5 additions & 6 deletions dokimi/docs/grading-tiers.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ a version range on the check, or they should stay on the judge.

## Prototype (tier 2, plus the `cli_help` part of tier 1)

**Data:** the 13-skill study on the lab box (`skill-content-intel/data`): 4,770 atoms,
**Data:** the 13-skill study's stored data (not published): 4,770 atoms,
776 probes, 19,524 stored probe results, each graded by two judges (`gpt-5.6-luna`, and
`claude-sonnet-5` on 17,805 of them). No new answers and no model calls: every check below
is a program. Sources: installed perf 6.17, gcc 13.3 and GNU as (executed), the gcc 13
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -313,8 +313,7 @@ false pass, and a narrow rule for `without`, `no` and `if you can't` forms is tr

## Reproducing

The three scripts and their outputs are kept outside the repo, on the lab box
(`/localdisk/napetrov/detpilot/tier2_proto.py`, `tier2_round2.py`, `tier2_round3.py` and
the `tier2_*.json` they write). They read `skill-content-intel/data/{atoms,probes,probe_results}.jsonl`
and need perf, gcc, binutils, cmake and outbound HTTPS. Round 3's perf check is now
`skill novelty ground`; the router of round 2 and the `source` check are not in the repo.
The three prototype scripts and their outputs are not in the repository. They read the
study's atoms, probes and probe results and need perf, gcc, binutils, cmake and outbound
HTTPS. Round 3's perf check is now `skill novelty ground`; the router of round 2 and the
`source` check are not in the repo.
Loading