Repository navigation
Description
Problem
The accepted Base governance design and implementation plan identify package 14/base as a required deliverable. This issue translates that package into a reviewed, bounded issue/PR train; it does not authorize implementation before the issue reaches Ready.
Expected behavior
After package 13b is released and proven, remove the Base repository's tracked .ai-context/ files in a separate reviewed PR. Update AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, manifest checklists and scheduled exports that refer to them. Remove only the obsolete .ai-context/ item check from the PR-body validator successor; keep every other PR contract validation rule.
Scope and non-goals
Scope: After package 13b is released and proven, remove the Base repository's tracked .ai-context/ files in a separate reviewed PR. Update AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, manifest checklists and scheduled exports that refer to them. Remove only the obsolete .ai-context/ item check from the PR-body validator successor; keep every other PR contract validation rule.
Non-goals: Do not silently expand scope, activate unreviewed policy, mirror issue fields onto PRs, grant agents merge/release authority, or make changes outside the named affected areas. Any new product decision or materially new work gets a separate issue and decision record.
Affected areas
- Base
.ai-context/, AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, manifest checklist, scheduled exports and PR validator. - Accepted source: governance design and implementation plan, PR #2664
- Parent tracker: #2665
Impact and evidence
- Product intent: Implements only the accepted governance design and plan; any product-requirement change must be filed separately.
- Architecture and contracts: Destination is the package-specific section of the merged governance design/implementation plan plus the affected canonical contract named above.
- User guidance: The issue identifies likely guidance paths; the implementation PR must name updated user/FAQ/README paths or give a change-specific reason why none is affected.
- CLI/API and reference: The affected-area list determines whether CLI/API/reference docs change; the implementation PR must cite the exact reference path or justify no impact.
- Operations and safety: No privileged automation or merge authority is implied; the PR must list operational/security effects and any rollback.
- Validation and testing: The issue lists the planned tests; the PR must report executed validation and explain any unavailable test.
- Examples and downstream use: The implementation PR must identify affected examples/consumers or give evidence that this change has no downstream surface.
- Governance and contributor process: This package changes or preserves the contributor/governance contract as described in Scope; links must point to the canonical rules.
- Decision records: No new decision is accepted by this issue; any durable deviation requires a proposed decision record and explicit maintainer acceptance.
- Release notes: The PR must include a user-facing release-note line or a reasoned
none; this issue does not pre-decide that disposition.
These are issue-stage dispositions to refine during Triage. Before Ready, every category must have its exact destination or evidence-based no-impact reason; the PR repeats the ten-category evidence for actual changes.
Open questions
- None known. If implementation exposes an unresolved contract, return this issue to Triage and record the decision before implementation continues.
Plan
- S1: One focused PR for this issue. Use
Fixes #Nonly if no additional slice is needed; if the maintainer approves multiple PRs, name eachS1…Snhere before the first is opened and usePart of #N. - Dependencies: the P13b issue, the P5a issue, the P7c issue
- Acceptance criteria:
- Package 13b release and output/privacy/failure proof are linked before cleanup begins.
- All tracked
.ai-context/files and stale references/scheduled exports in Base are removed or migrated to canonical docs. - The PR-body validator retains issue/slice, validation, all impact categories and release-note checks while dropping only the obsolete
.ai-context/item check. - Generated exports remain outside the repository and are not treated as canonical source documents.
- Rollback restores tracked context and schedules if the replacement is unavailable or materially regresses.
- Validation:
- Search tracked files, workflows, docs and tests for stale
.ai-context/references; classify all hits. - Run repository context/agent instruction checks and the PR-validator contract fixtures.
- Confirm
basectl export-contextoutput remains outside the repo. - Risks and rollback: Removing the old source too early creates an unmaintained context gap; block until package 13b is released and proven, and restore through a reviewed PR if needed.
- Decision impact: No decision is accepted merely by implementing the issue. Record the relevant accepted decision/ADR and file a superseding record if the maintainer approves a change.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
- StatusShow more project fieldsBacklog
Activity
codeforester commentedon Nov 11, 2026
Pre-Triage review against the accepted plan (#2664, tracker #2665)
.ai-context/item (plan package 14), not on Reconcile issue status from named delivery slices #2673. Replace the native link to Reconcile issue status from named delivery slices #2673 with one to Validate pull request impact, acceptance and release-note evidence #2572..ai-context/; the scheduled workflows arebase-demo-e2e.ymlanddownstream-version-bumps.yml. The nightly export mentioned in design §2 (L48) runs somewhere else, so name it. The in-repo references to clean up are:.github/pull_request_template.md;AI Context Impactpath rule inbase_manifest.yamlgithub.pr.required_sections.paths;.github/workflows/skills.yml:104;AGENTS.md(L66–70);CONTRIBUTING.md.Dependencies text. Replace
the P13b issue, the P5a issue, the P7c issuewith #2687, #2669 and #2572. The native blocked-by links are already correct; the body is what a reviewer reads.Contract text. The Impact, Scope and Open questions sections are still the shared template text. The Impact section is identical in 24 of #2666–#2690, and Scope repeats Expected behavior. That's fine in Backlog. Before Ready, replace each with this issue's own dispositions.
Claude Code (Opus 5.5), reviewing from Ramesh's account at his request. This review comes before Triage, so it is not an issue-loop round.