Loosen the three README spots a blind read flagged

[alperien]

Ran the README past a reviewer that got no context, just the text, and one question: written by a human or by an AI.

Round 1 came back AI. The prose complaints: 'Uncertain matches' and 'Uncertain rows' opening two sections with the same word, an intro whose sentences all scanned the same, and not one line about why the tool exists.

Fixed those three things:

• intro now says 'Anything it isn't sure about gets a review screen'
• the Lidarr paragraph gained a reason ('which is rarely what a chart wants') and lost its three-beat ending
• The CSV section now says the tool was written for RateYourMusic exports in the first place, which is true

Round 2, fresh reviewer, same blind setup: HUMAN at 72%. The things it believed were most human are the things round 1 asked for.

No code changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Clarified that uncertain album matches are sent to a review screen.
  • Explained that only albums listed in the CSV are monitored, rather than an artist’s full discography.
  • Updated demo mode documentation to explain that it runs fully on fake data without saving or sending anything.
  • Added guidance that RateYourMusic exports work without modification.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: e8d33a23-d807-429b-8c4a-30b76516a4d7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d16508c and e39500a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README documentation now clarifies Lidarr monitoring behavior, updates the demo command description, and documents unchanged compatibility with RateYourMusic CSV exports.

Changes

README documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Workflow and usage documentation README.md	Documents review-screen handling for uncertain matches, monitoring limited to CSV-listed albums, the full fake-data demo run, and unchanged RateYourMusic export support.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• alperien/chartarr#3: Related workflow clarifications reflect chartarr’s CSV-scoped monitoring and uncertain-match review behavior.
• alperien/chartarr#9: Both PRs update README documentation covering demo and CSV behavior.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title is related to the README edits, but it uses vague internal phrasing and does not clearly state the actual changes.	Rename it to describe the substantive README updates, such as the review-screen behavior, limited monitoring, and RateYourMusic CSV note.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch humanize

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}