Fuse endpoint transport and sharpen the seed exponent - #59
Draft
SamPetkov wants to merge 9 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Owner
Author
Final exact-head validationFinal head: Both independent workflows completed successfully:
The final head passed:
The final candidate bound on this branch is with the corresponding Paley--Zygmund seed lower bound. The PR remains a draft because integrated private Lean replay and independent mathematical review are still required. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
This stacked draft PR builds on PR #58 and targets genuine mathematical simplifications in the Section 8--9 second-moment argument. It removes two avoidable losses, reduces the number of theorem interfaces needed for Lean, and derives a sharper quantitative seed bound.
The random variable, four-size profile, canonical high-cell decomposition, main theorem, and displayed coefficient are unchanged. The publication gate remains fail-closed and
\ErdosProofClosedfalseremains mandatory.Result 1: type-preserving deficit summation
The coarse ledger forgets endpoint type, bounds every deficit by
rho_16, counts up toalpha+1possible deficits, and only later performs endpoint transport. This introduces an artificial factoralpha+1.For endpoint type
(i,j), defineThe local geometric sum gives
After weighted regrouping by the realized endpoint table
L,Result 2: a single fused
4 x 4kernelDefine
Multiplying the square-free endpoint inequality by
(B^L)^2, followed by one arithmetic--geometric mean step and one multinomial sum, givesThis single proposition replaces the separate
alpha+1deficit count, support-cardinality loss, unweighted table regrouping, and endpoint row-sum estimate.Using the exact phase formula,
so
The previous coarse deficit contribution was
O(n^(3/4) log n).Result 3: fixed-buffer critical-quarter residual split
The previous residual proof splits at
m_0=2^(U/3). The exponent1/3is convenient but not structural. The endpoint reward has quadratic exponentU^2/8, so the critical exponential scale is2^(U/4).This PR uses the explicit threshold
If
m_0>=T_U, thenFor
R=floor(U/2), log-convexity reduces the higher activity to the two endpoint terms. The full endpoint usesWith
1<log_2 e<3/2and1<log_2(7/3)<5/4, its logarithm is at mostwhich is negative for
R>=6. HenceIf
m_0<T_U, the existing crude estimate givesTherefore
This improves the previous complementary order
O(n^(2/3)(log n)^(1/3)).Quantitative seed corollary
Combining the exact conditioned decomposition with the two sharpened exponents yields a fixed
C_sharpsuch thatThis is strictly stronger than the
o(n/(log n)^4)exponent required by the existing amplifier and does not alter the final theorem coefficient.Files
625/arxiv/SECTION9_SHARPENED_TRANSPORT_ATTACHMENT_V4.tex625/experiments/check_sharpened_transport_attachment_v4.py625/audits/FUSED_TRANSPORT_CRITICAL_QUARTER_AUDIT_2026-08-10.md625/scripts/build_phase_root_self_contained_v3.pyThe generator inserts the refinement after the explicit Section 9 ledger and before rare-event amplification. It executes the new checker before manuscript assembly.
Fail-closed checks
The checker verifies:
(9.43)--(9.57);binom(R,2)-U(R-2)/4 <= R/2for8<=U<=4096;theta=(eU/64)2^(-U/4)for12<=U<=4096;The finite sweep is a regression check, not a replacement for the analytic factorial argument.
Verification boundary
This is a candidate strengthening, not a welded proof claim. Promotion still requires independent line-by-line review, replay against the private welded Section 8 chain, exact Lean declarations with the same finite domains and quantifier order, and the final axiom/dependency audit.