Remove the midpoint loss in the Erdős 625 gap - #60
Draft
SamPetkov wants to merge 16 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Owner
Author
Final exact-head validationFinal head: Dedicated workflow run
The exact head passed:
The generated V4 manuscript has 57 pages and 26,308 extracted words. The manuscript artifact is The candidate strengthened statement on this branch is with coefficient The stronger pre-slack certificate is The PR remains a draft and fail-closed. The one-part-buffer slope integration, revised full corner, and full-coefficient adapter still require independent mathematical review and exact private Lean replay before promotion. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
This stacked draft PR builds on PR #59 and turns the earlier near-root research target into a concrete theorem-facing candidate. The previous manuscript placed the signed four-size profile at the midpoint between the signed and ordinary first-moment roots, retaining one half of the leading root separation. This PR shows that the midpoint margin is substantially stronger than the proof consumes.
The replacement profile is
Its distance from the signed real root lies in
[1,2). The uniform root slope therefore gives a signed first-moment exponent of order(log n)^2. That margin is sufficient for both actual consumers in the partial-diagonal proof, so the full leading root separation is retained.The random variable, four-size support, exact overlap identity, fused endpoint kernel, critical-quarter residual estimate, and final entropy certificate are unchanged. The publication switch remains fail-closed.
New result 1: a one-part-buffer profile
Let
Then exactly
Since
r_4^co,k_co=Theta(n/log n), every intermediate point satisfiesThus the complete segment remains in the common slope corridor. Integrating
over a displacement in
[1,2)givesAfter the existing exact tangent correction and Stirling extraction, the integer profile satisfies
uniformly across the complete phase.
New result 2: the smaller first moment is sufficient
The audit identifies only two load-bearing uses of the midpoint first-moment margin.
Central partial diagonals
The affine extraction uses
(log E Z)/k_co. At the one-part profile,so the same phase-uniform bound on the affine profile term follows.
Full corner
The reverse recurrence gives
B(h)<=1, henceThere are at most
(k_co+1)^4residual profiles, soThe logarithm of the profile count is only
O(log n). The empty corner, central rate, endpoint transport, and residual attachment require only the same root corridor, coordinate positivity, andk_i=Theta(n/log n).New result 3: full leading root separation
The chromatic lower threshold satisfies
while the new signed profile satisfies
Therefore
The former midpoint factor
1/2disappears.New result 4: explicit amplification loss
PR #59 gives
Using this seed exponent in the arbitrary-seed amplifier with
r_n=log naddsclasses, with failure probability tending to zero. Thus amplification consumes none of the leading root coefficient.
Quantitative strengthening
The exact certificate remains
The candidate uniform coefficient becomes
and the stronger pre-slack coefficient is
The first number is exactly twice the midpoint coefficient in PR #58.
Formal simplification
The near-root interface removes the midpoint selector and the theorem propagating exactly half the root gap. The proposed exact formal spine is:
1 <= ceil(x)+1-x < 2;[1,2);exp(-c(log n)^2);Files
625/arxiv/AMS_NEAR_ROOT_DRAFT_V4.tex625/arxiv/FRONTMATTER_INTRODUCTION_NEAR_ROOT_V4.tex625/arxiv/PROOF_ARCHITECTURE_NEAR_ROOT_V4.tex625/arxiv/SECTION5_NEAR_ROOT_PROFILE_V4.tex625/arxiv/SECTION7_FULL_CORNER_NEAR_ROOT_V4.tex625/arxiv/FINAL_ASSEMBLY_NEAR_ROOT_V4.tex625/arxiv/FORMALIZATION_STATUS_NEAR_ROOT_ADDENDUM_2026_08_11_V4.tex625/scripts/build_near_root_self_contained_v4.py625/experiments/check_near_root_full_gap_v4.py625/audits/NEAR_ROOT_FULL_GAP_AUDIT_2026-08-11.md.github/workflows/erdos625-near-root-full-gap.ymlThe Version 3/PR #59 manuscript remains unchanged as a verified fallback. The V4 wrapper invokes that generator and replaces only the profile-placement block, the full-corner adapter, and the final assembly.
Pre-PR checks
Before opening the PR, the new sources passed:
1 <= ceil(x)+1-x < 2on more than 100,000 rational inputs;The dedicated PR workflow now performs the integrated exact-head build and replays the PR #59 sharpened checker under ordinary and optimized Python.
Verification boundary
This is a candidate strengthening, not a proof-closure declaration. Promotion still requires independent line-by-line mathematical review, exact Lean statements with the same ceiling convention and quantifier order, replay of the revised full corner against the exact complementary identity, integrated replay of the fused skeleton and attachment packages at the same integer profile, and the final axiom/dependency audit.
\ErdosProofClosedfalseremains mandatory.