[hua7450]

Closes #10357
Closes #10358

What and why

PolicyEngine's medically needy pathway for aged, blind and disabled people (is_medically_needy_for_medicaid) had two problems. Five states that run the pathway had it switched off, and most limits still held 2018 values. This PR switches the five states on and updates the limits in 14 states. Where a state ties its limit to the poverty guideline or the SSI federal benefit rate, the PR encodes that rate in place of a dollar amount.

Pathway switched on (senior and disabled flags)

State	Limits (monthly income; assets)	Source
AR	$108.33 / $216.66 (was $108 / $217); $2,000 / $3,000 (unchanged)	AR DHS Quick Reference ("AABD Adult Spend Down $108.33 $216.66"); Medical Services Policy Manual (9/2026), O-710, p435 ($108.33 / $216.66)
IA	$483 / $483; $10,000 (unchanged)	Iowa Admin. Code 441-75.8, pp. 20 ("SSI-related persons"), 22 (resources, $10,000 per household), 24 (MNIL $483 / $483)
NJ	$367 / $434; $4,000 / $6,000 (unchanged)	DMAHS Medically Needy fact sheet (archived 2026-05-14; the live link now returns 404)
IL	100% FPL; $17,500 from 2023-05-12	305 ILCS 5/5-2(2)(a)(ii) (income after medical costs "equal to or less than 100% of the federal poverty level"); PM 15-06-02-a ("The Community Standard is 100% of the Federal Poverty Level"); PM 15-08-00; PM 07-02-01 ("Effective 05/12/2023, the asset limit for Medical cases is $17,500")
ND	83% FPL, then 90% FPL from 2024-01-01; $3,000 / $6,000 (unchanged)	Manual 510-05-85-40 ("equal to 90% of the poverty level"); ML 3702 (83% in April 2023); SPA ND-23-0034 (effective 1/1/2024); NDAC 75-02-02.1-26

Pathway switched off (senior and disabled flags)

AZ, ID, IN, NM and NV had the senior and disabled flags on, swapped with AR, IL, IA, NJ and ND. KFF's 2018 and 2026 tables, already cited in the flag files, list no medically needy program for aged, blind or disabled people in these five states. They are now off from 2015. Their limits were -.inf, so no result changes.

Limits tied to a federal amount

State	Before	After	Source
KS	$475 / $475	SSI rate from 2025-07-01 ($994 / $1,491 in 2026)	CMS approval of KS-25-0019, p7 ($475 for one and two people), p2 (effective July 1, 2025) and p46 (disregards the difference between the MNIL and the SSI federal benefit rate); KEESM F-8 (01-26): independent living $994 (1) / $1,491 (2)
WA	$750 / $750	One-person SSI rate for one and two people	WAC 182-519-0050(5) ("the one-person federal benefit rate (FBR) ... or the MNIL listed in the chart below, whichever amount is higher"); in force since WSR 12-20-001
MN	$810 / $1,098	80% FPL, 81% from 2019-06-01, 100% from 2022-07-01	Minn. Stat. 256B.056, subd. 5c(b), 4(a), 1c(a); Laws 2017, 1st Sp., ch. 6; Laws 2019, 1st Sp., ch. 9; EPM 2.3.3.4
UT	$1,012 / $1,372 (2018)	100% FPL	Utah Admin. Code R414-304-9(2); Utah Code 26B-3-108(9)(b)
WI	$592 / $592	100% FPL from 2019-09-01	Wis. Stat. 49.47(4)(c)1; Ops Memo 19-26 (Wayback; the live link returns 404); MEH 39.4.1 ($1,330.00 / $1,803.33 from 2/1/2026)
NY	$842 / $1,233	$934 / $1,367 in 2022; 138% FPL from 2023-01-01	GIS 22 MA/11; SPA NY-23-0001

Dollar limits updated

State	Before	After	Source
CT	$523 / $696	$653 / $879 (2022-07-01), $700 / $946 (2024-01-01), $723 / $980 (2024-03-01), $835 / $1,128 (2025-03-01), $851 / $1,153 (2026-03-01)	SPAs CT-22-0031, CT-24-0003, CT-24-0006, CT-25-0013 and CT-26-0006 (p7 of each); DSS chart 3/1/26
DC	$652 / $652	$669.35 / $704.58 (2019), $682.42 / $718.33 (2020), $689.54 / $725.83 (2021), $724.77 / $762.92 (2022), $780.58 / $821.67 (2023), $809.08 / $851.67 (2024), $837.19 / $881.25 (2025), $856.58 / $901.67 (2026)	29 DCMR 901.1 (2003); DHCF notice ($780.58, 2023); DHCF fact sheet ($809.08, 2024); KFF 2026 ($857 / $902)
NH	$591 / $675	$888 / $1,033 (2023-01-01), $916 / $1,066 (2025-01-01), $939 / $1,093 (2025-07-01)	SPAs NH-23-0029, NH-25-0012 and NH-25-0019 (p7 of each)
RI	$903 / $947	Each January 1 from 2019 to 2026, ending at $1,200 / $1,242	210-RICR-40-00-3 § 3.2.8(A)(8) and its 2020 version; SPAs RI-21-0004 (p4) and RI-22-0003 to RI-26-0001 (p7)
VT	$1,041 / $1,041 (2018)	The protected income level (PIL) outside Chittenden County, the same for one and two people: $1,091 (2020), $1,100 (2021), $1,166 (2022), $1,258 (2023), $1,300 (2024), $1,333 (2025), $1,375 (2026), each January 1	HBEE Part 2 § 8.06(b) (eligible if income is "at or below the PIL"); HBEE Part 5 § 29.14, pp. 50–52; DCF B17-26 (2018); DVHA 2020 PIL chart; DVHA Standards Change for Healthcare 2021–2025 and 2026 (p1 of each)

Asset limits updated

State	Before	After	Source
CA	$2,000 / $3,000	$130,000 / $195,000 from 2022-07-01; no limit in 2024–2025; $130,000 / $195,000 from 2026-01-01	Welf. & Inst. Code 14005.62 (a), (c), (d); ACWDL 21-31, 22-25 and 25-14 (p8 lists the aged, blind and disabled medically needy aid codes)
IL	$2,000 / $3,000	$17,500 / $17,500 from 2023-05-12	PM 07-02-01
NY	$15,150 / $22,200	$16,800 / $24,600 (2022), $30,182 / $40,821 (2023), $31,175 / $42,312 (2024), $32,396 / $43,781 (2025), $33,038 / $44,796 (2026)	GIS 22 MA/11 p2; GIS 23 MA/02, 24 MA/01, 25 MA/03 and 26 MA/05 attachments, p2

How the model applies them

• New variable medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit (person, annual). It returns one of three amounts:
  • fpg_rate times the poverty guideline for one or two people, when the state's fpg_rate is above zero. The monthly amount is fixed at cents, then rounded up to the dollar in NY and ND (limit.income.rounds_up_monthly) and down in IL from 2023 (limit.income.rounds_down_monthly), as their published tables do: NY $1,836 / $2,489 in 2026 for 138% FPL of $1,835.40 / $2,488.60; ND $1,009 in 2023 and $1,130 in 2024; IL $1,803 for two in 2026. WI keeps cents; MN and UT are not confirmed and stay unrounded;
  • otherwise, ssi_rate times the SSI federal benefit rate (individual or couple rate), when the state's ssi_rate is above zero;
  • otherwise, 12 times the monthly dollar limit.
• The individual or couple choice follows the marital unit, as in medicaid_optional_senior_or_disabled_income_limit (42 CFR 435.602).
• Merged with main after Count blind people and use the individual or couple in the Medicaid medically needy test #10370 (3a8bf04, at b210b45). The spend-down test now uses the marital unit throughout, from Count blind people and use the individual or couple in the Medicaid medically needy test #10370, with this PR's income limit. The two conflicting test files kept main's cases first: this PR's cases in is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yaml are now Cases 11-23 (Cases 24-27 are new in this round), and is_in_medicaid_medically_needy_category.yaml keeps main's Cases 1-2, then this PR's Cases 3-4.
• Merge order. PR Use state dollar standards for the Medicaid aged, blind and disabled income limit in AK, ID, NH, VT and WI #10378 merges after this PR. PR Lower California's non-MAGI Medi-Cal asset limit to $21,000 / $31,000 on July 1, 2027 #10375 is stacked on this PR and Apply state Medicare Savings Program asset limits and income exclusions (WA, CA, MN, IL, MS) #10360 and merges after both.
• New limit.income.fpg_rate (IL, MN, ND, NY, UT, WI) and limit.income.ssi_rate (KS, WA). These files list only the states that use them. NY, WI and KS carry a zero share before their switch dates.
• New flag limit.income.couple_uses_individual_limit, true for Washington only. Washington's MNIL chart gives the one-person benefit rate to households of one and two people. Kansas's F-8 table gives couples the couple rate.
• The dollar files drop IL, MN, ND, UT and WA, whose rates apply from the files' first date (2018-01-01). Their 2018 dollar figures match the rate times the 2018 guideline or benefit rate, rounded up to the dollar.

Not confirmed against a primary source

• DC: DHCF publishes only the one-person level ($780.58 for 2023 and $809.08 for 2024). The couple levels and the 2025–2026 values follow the method in 29 DCMR 901.1 and its table: the two-person level is 50% of the two-person guideline, and the one-person level is 95% of that. This method reproduces both DHCF figures and KFF's 2026 figures, which KFF rounds to $857 / $902. Sources give values by year only, so the parameter dates them January 1.

• ND: no North Dakota document says when 90% replaced 83%. The manual shows 83% in April 2023 and 90% in April 2024. SPA ND-23-0034 (effective 2024-01-01) aligns the medically needy standards at 90%. Manual letter 3776 (1/1/2024) and the table in ML 3790 point to the same date, so the parameter uses 2024-01-01.

• NH: KFF 2026 lists $926 / $1,073. The CMS-approved SPA NH-25-0019 and NH's current manual tables show $939 / $1,093 from 2025-07-01, and the PR uses those.

• VT 2019: no 2019 PIL was found (DVHA's 2019 chart is not online or archived), so 2018's $1,041 stays in force through 2019.

• IL: IDHS does not state when it applies each year's new guideline. Illinois's Department on Aging says the figures post in early April.

• DC state plan: CMS-approved SPA DC-22-0014 (effective 10/1/2022, pp. 15–17) still lists the 1994 six-month levels, $2,262 / $2,382, or $377 / $397 a month. The PR follows 29 DCMR 901.1 and DHCF's notices. No statute is involved.

Limitations

• Vermont couples. HBEE 29.14 tests a couple against "the PIL or the SSI/AABD payment standard for two, whichever is higher", but spend-down reduces income to "the applicable PIL" (29.14(a)(iv)), and 8.06(b) sets the medically needy level at the PIL. So the medically needy limit here is the PIL alone. A couple between the PIL ($1,375) and the AABD couple standard ($1,596.80 in 2026) qualifies through the categorical aged, blind and disabled group (HBEE 8.05(b)), which draft Use state dollar standards for the Medicaid aged, blind and disabled income limit in AK, ID, NH, VT and WI #10378 encodes. Until Use state dollar standards for the Medicaid aged, blind and disabled income limit in AK, ID, NH, VT and WI #10378 merges, the model's Vermont ABD limit for couples is 80% of the FPL.
• Minnesota Title II COLA. Minnesota does not count the January Social Security increase until July 1 for these cases (Minn. Stat. 256B.056, subd. 1a(a)(3)). The annual model counts the full year's benefit.
• Connecticut. The medically needy test omits the MAABD unearned income disregard ($562 a month per member in 2026, UPM 5030.15), so Connecticut's countable income is too high. Follow-up issue Medicaid medically needy: state income exclusions in place of SSI's $20 (Illinois $25 per spouse; Connecticut's HUSKY C disregard per member; Minnesota none) #10472, which also covers Illinois's $25.
• Values dated after January 1 apply from the next calendar year, because the limits are annual and read parameters on January 1. Examples: Kansas's July 2025 switch applies from 2026; Connecticut's March 2026 amounts apply from 2027; New Hampshire's July 2025 amounts apply from 2026; Illinois's $17,500 (May 2023) applies from 2024; California's $130,000 (July 2022) applies from 2023.
• These variables are annual. They use the poverty guideline dated January 1 of the year. The states adopt new guidelines on their own schedules: MN July 1, WI February 1, ND April 1, Utah in March, and NY back-dated to January 1.
• Rounding: NY and ND round the monthly level up to the dollar and IL drops the cents, as the model now does; WI keeps cents. MN and UT are not confirmed (no primary table), so they stay unrounded and can differ from a published level by less than $1 a month.
• DC keeps KFF 2018's $652 / $652 for 2018; from 2019 the levels follow 29 DCMR 901.1 (50% of the two-person guideline for a couple, 95% of that for one person). NY keeps its 2018 amounts through 2021, because the NY GIS messages for 2019–2021 could not be retrieved.
• Illinois: PM 15-08-00 starts spend-down when income "and/or nonexempt resources" exceed the limits, but the model applies a hard asset test; and PM 15-06-02-c counts everyone in the home when the client has children under 18, but the model caps the unit at two. Both understate Illinois eligibility.
• New Jersey's medically needy package excludes inpatient hospital care and prescribed drugs (fact sheet; N.J.A.C. 10:70), but medicaid values these enrollees at the full per-capita cost.
• Connecticut set different limits by region from July 2021 to June 2022. This PR does not encode those regional amounts, so Connecticut keeps $523 / $696 until 2022-07-01.

Out of scope

• Michigan (issue Update Michigan SSI-related Medicaid asset limits and ABD pathways #8453).
• North Dakota: draft Fix WV Medicaid spouse standards and ND medically needy coverage #10394 edits the same four limit files with ND dollar amounts from 2025-04-01 ($1,174 / $1,587). This PR uses 90% FPL with rounding up ($1,197 / $1,623 in 2026), so the two need one ND encoding before Fix WV Medicaid spouse standards and ND medically needy coverage #10394 merges.
• Regional limits in LA and VA, and Vermont's higher PIL inside Chittenden County ($1,483 in 2026; the PR applies the outside-Chittenden PIL statewide).
• Medically needy groups for pregnant women, children and parents.
• California's non-MAGI asset limit drops to $21,000 / $31,000 on 2027-07-01 (SB 164, Stats. 2026, ch. 27). Draft Lower California's non-MAGI Medi-Cal asset limit to $21,000 / $31,000 on July 1, 2027 #10375, stacked on this PR, encodes it.
• Massachusetts: KFF 2026 lists the aged and disabled medically needy limit at 100% FPL, against PolicyEngine's $522 / $650. Not checked against MassHealth rules.
• Illinois's $25 AABD income exemption, one per spouse with income (PM 15-04-03-a): the pathway uses SSI countable income, with one $20 exclusion. Follow-up issue Medicaid medically needy: state income exclusions in place of SSI's $20 (Illinois $25 per spouse; Connecticut's HUSKY C disregard per member; Minnesota none) #10472.
• The pregnant, child and parent medically needy flags have the same five swapped state pairs, and parent.yaml has more differences. Follow-up issue Medicaid medically needy: fix the pregnant, child and parent category flags against KFF and state sources #10473.

Test plan

• New medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml (22 cases, including Vermont's PIL for every year from 2018 to 2026):
  • year-keyed households (a couple plus a single relative) pin every dated CT, DC, NH and RI dollar value, NY's 2022 dollar value and 2023 rate, MN's 80% and 81%, ND's 83% and WI's 2019 dollar value;
  • one case per rate state at its current limit, plus Kansas before its July 2025 switch; NY 2026 at $29,868 for a couple and IL 2026 at $21,636 (rounded);
  • Case 19: AR, IA and NJ dollar limits in 2026; Case 20: MN 100% from 2023 and ND 90% from 2024 ($12,108 and $13,560, rounded up); Case 21: an aged parent on a married child's joint return uses the individual limit ($22,032); Case 22: DC 2019-2022 under 29 DCMR 901.1.
• New cases in is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yaml:
  • a senior in each of AR, IA, NJ, IL and ND whose income exceeds the limit before medical expenses and meets it after. NJ's income is above the optional aged, blind and disabled limit, and ND's income after expenses equals its limit;
  • assets exactly at the IL ($17,500), CA ($130,000) and NY ($33,038) limits; CA one dollar over; CA in 2024 with no limit; NY at each year's level from 2022 to 2026;
  • NY, CA and IL couples at the 2026 couple asset limits;
  • a Vermont senior whose income after medical expenses equals the 2026 PIL ($16,500 a year, eligible) and one dollar a month over (ineligible);
  • Case 24: an IL senior with assets at $17,500 in 2024; Cases 25-26: a NY senior at the published $22,032 (eligible) and $22,033 (ineligible) in 2026; Case 27: an IL couple at $21,640, above the published $21,636 (ineligible).
• is_in_medicaid_medically_needy_category.yaml: disabled adults in AR, IA, IL, ND and NJ are in a medically needy category; a senior and a disabled adult in AZ are not.
• Updated an existing Kansas case in medicaid_medically_needy_medical_expenses.yaml. Under the 2026 limit ($11,928) the old income passed both ways. The case now uses countable income of $15,000, so it still distinguishes deducting pretax premiums once from deducting them twice.
• Source conflicts: none involving a statute. DC 2018 stays at KFF's $652 rather than the 29 DCMR 901.1 method; that is an existing value, not changed here. One non-statute conflict is disclosed above (DC's state plan against 29 DCMR 901.1).
• make format (ruff)
• Changelog fragment in changelog.d/
• CI passes (tests were not run locally)

No file in tests/policy/baseline/partners/ changes. By static reading, the partner Medicaid cases in these states are seniors who already qualify through the aged, blind and disabled pathway, and the medically needy pathway applies only to people outside every other pathway. CI will confirm once the PR is ready.

axiom: TheAxiomFoundation/rulespec-us#1938 queued

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[PavelMakarchuk]

Program Review

PR #10374, "Update Medicaid medically needy limits and switch on AR, IA, IL, NJ and ND" (hua7450). Round 1, full review.

IDs: C = critical, SA = should address, G = suggestion.

Paths: VAR/ = policyengine_us/variables/gov/hhs/medicaid/eligibility/categories/medically_needy/, V = VAR/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.py, E = VAR/is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.py, MN/ = policyengine_us/parameters/gov/hhs/medicaid/eligibility/categories/medically_needy/, INC/ = MN/limit/income/, AST/ = MN/limit/assets/, CAT/ = MN/categories/, T/ = policyengine_us/tests/policy/baseline/gov/hhs/medicaid/eligibility/categories/medically_needy/. Line numbers refer to the reviewed head. Every PDF link uses the file page number.

Source Documents

• Reviewed head SHA: 15059d9
• Mode: full
• Scope: 16 files, +1,424 / -53 against the merge base 4a1a3cdeb7. The analysis ran at c1b120a6ed; the only later commit merges main and changes none of the 16 files. Decisive probes and all fix runs were repeated at the head.
• Federal: 42 CFR 435.811, 435.602, 435.831, 435.1007; KFF 2018 (Table 3) and 2026 (Appendix Table 4).
• New York: PDF GIS 22 MA/11 (pages 1-2); attachments of 22 MA/01, 23 MA/02, 24 MA/01, 25 MA/03 (image) and 26 MA/05 (page 2 each); PDF SPA NY-23-0001.
• North Dakota: 510-05-85-40 and its ML 3896 archive; PDF ML 3702 (page 6), ML 3776 (page 1, image), SPA ND-23-0034 (pages 2, 5; images), NDAC 75-02-02.1 (page 40).
• Illinois: WAG 25-03-02(2) (live, and Wayback 2023-06-08, 2024-07-15, 2025-05-15); 305 ILCS 5/5-2; PM 15-06-02-a, 15-06-02-c, 15-08-00, 07-02-01; 89 IAC 120.20.
• WI, DC, NJ: PDF WI Ops Memo 19-26 (Wayback, page 2, image), MEH 39.4.1; PDF 29 DCMR 901.1 (image), DHCF notice and fact sheet (page 2), SPA DC-22-0014 (pages 15-17); PDF NJ fact sheet (Wayback), N.J.A.C. 10:70-1.2 and 10:70-5.1.
• Other states: every other reference in the PR's files (74 links) was opened at its cited file page (SPA pages as images). A fix carries the links it adds.
• Repository: policyengine_us/variables/gov/hhs/medicaid/eligibility/categories/medicaid_optional_senior_or_disabled_income_limit.py:46 (Missouri np.ceil); #9561 and #9563.
• Year: target 2026. Values checked 2018-2026.

Branch Status

• 8 commits ahead and 6 behind main (8ea43422e6); base main; MERGEABLE. CI at the head: 33 pass, 0 fail.
• Merge after #10370, as the body says. Both PRs edit E on different lines, and the Python merges cleanly. At this head the test mixes units (SA1); after #10370 it uses the marital unit throughout.
• #10370 has its own open critical item. PavelMakarchuk's review found that #10370 drops the parents' medical expenses from a child's spend-down (42 CFR 435.831(d)). This PR does not cause or fix it, and its limit (a child is a unit of one) stays right after #10370's fix, which must come first.
• Test-file conflicts with #10370. Two test files conflict at the end. Resolved as the body says, the medically needy folder passed 47 of 47. Renumber the new C1 and SA4 cases then.
• #10375 is stacked on this PR (its commits plus California's 2027 asset limits). Rebase it after this PR changes.
• Other overlaps. Draft #10394 (G3). #10240 also appends to T/is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yaml. #10378 merges after this PR. #10361 and #10386 change the optional ABD pathway, but the new tests set is_optional_senior_or_disabled_for_medicaid: false.

What the PR gets right

• All 10 flag changes are right, and after the PR the senior and disabled flags of all 51 jurisdictions match KFF 2026. The switch-offs change no result, because those limits were -.inf.
• All 112 dated values checked, in 17 states and DC, match their sources.
• The rate encodings follow the law, with exact dates: MN 80%, 81% and 100%; KS at the SSI rate from 2025-07-01; WA at the one-person rate for sizes 1 and 2; UT 100%; NY 138% from 2023. The updated KS medical-expenses case is right.
• The new variable has no hard-coded amounts, is vectorized, and sizes the unit by marital unit (42 CFR 435.602). The year-keyed tests pin every dated CT, DC, NH, RI and VT value.
• The body states its limits and merge steps clearly. No partner test is edited; the changelog fragment is correct.

Critical (Must Fix)

C1. Rate-based limits are not rounded to the whole-dollar monthly levels that NY, ND and IL publish.

• Where: V:34-41. The rate branch returns fpg_rate * unit_fpg with no rounding.
• Evidence: NY and ND round up to the next dollar, and IL drops the cents.
  • NY (GIS attachments, page 2): 2025 $1,800 / $2,433 for 138% FPL of $1,799.75 / $2,432.25 (so not nearest-dollar); 2026 $1,836 / $2,489 for $1,835.40 / $2,488.60.
  • ND (ML 3702 page 6; ML 3896): 2023 $1,009 for $1,008.45; April 2024 $1,130 for $1,129.50.
  • IL (WAG 25-03-02(2)): $1,803 for two in 2026, for $1,803.33; 2023-2025 also drop the cents.
  • WI keeps the cents (MEH 39.4.1, $1,803.33), so WI stays unrounded.
• A probe at the head flips eligibility at the published level. A NY senior at $22,032 in 2026 (12 × $1,836) is ineligible (model limit $22,024.80), as are NY at $21,600 in 2025 and ND at $13,560 in 2024. An IL couple at $21,640 in 2026 is eligible, above the published $21,636. The PR's tests pin the unrounded amounts (T/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml:173, :294, :337, :400).
• Why C: missing rounding, with a probe that flips eligibility at a published standard. The body mentions the gap, but that does not override a clear published standard. The repo's whole-dollar ceiling (#9561) leaves this pathway out (#9563), but that choice predates rate-based limits, and Missouri's rate limit is already rounded up (medicaid_optional_senior_or_disabled_income_limit.py:46). The band is under $1 a month.
• Fix (ran at the head with the SA fixes; results in the Validation Summary).

New INC/rounds_up_monthly.yaml:

description: States round the monthly medically needy income limit up to the next whole dollar under the Medicaid program, if this is true.
metadata:
  unit: bool
  period: year
  label: Medicaid medically needy income limit rounded up to a whole dollar
  breakdown:
    - state_code
  reference:
    - title: New York DOH GIS 26 MA/05, Attachment I, SSI-Related Medicaid Income Level $1,836 / $2,489 (138% FPL)
      href: https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/publications/docs/gis/26ma05_att1.pdf#page=2
    - title: New York DOH GIS 25 MA/03, Attachment I, SSI-Related Medicaid Income Level $1,800 / $2,433 (138% FPL)
      href: https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/publications/docs/gis/25ma03_att1.pdf#page=2
    - title: North Dakota Manual Letter 3702, medically needy income levels $1,009 / $1,364 (83% FPL)
      href: https://www.nd.gov/dhs/policymanuals/51003/Content/ML/2023/ML%203702%20Federal%20Poverty%20Level%20Updates%2004-01-2023.pdf#page=6
    - title: North Dakota Non-ACA Medicaid Manual 510-05-85-40 (archived, ML 3896), medically needy income level $1,130 (90% FPL)
      href: https://www.nd.gov/dhs/policymanuals/51005/Archived%20Documents/2025/3896/510_05_85_40.htm

ND:
  2018-01-01: true
NY:
  2018-01-01: true

New INC/rounds_down_monthly.yaml:

description: States round the monthly medically needy income limit down to a whole dollar under the Medicaid program, if this is true.
metadata:
  unit: bool
  period: year
  label: Medicaid medically needy income limit rounded down to a whole dollar
  breakdown:
    - state_code
  reference:
    - title: Illinois DHS Workers' Action Guide WAG 25-03-02(2), AABD 100% FPL monthly income standards ($1,803 for two in 2026)
      href: https://www.dhs.state.il.us/page.aspx?item=21741

IL:
  # IDHS tables drop the cents for one and two people from 2023; KFF 2018 does not.
  2018-01-01: false
  2023-01-01: true

V, insert above line 34, then use fpg_limit in place of fpg_rate * unit_fpg at line 37:

        fpg_limit = fpg_rate * unit_fpg
        # Some states publish the monthly level in whole dollars. Fix the
        # monthly amount at cent precision first, so floating-point noise
        # cannot move an exact whole dollar (as in medicaid_income_level).
        fpg_monthly = np.round(fpg_limit / MONTHS_IN_YEAR, 2)
        fpg_limit = select(
            [
                p.rounds_up_monthly[state].astype(bool),
                p.rounds_down_monthly[state].astype(bool),
            ],
            [
                np.ceil(fpg_monthly) * MONTHS_IN_YEAR,
                np.floor(fpg_monthly) * MONTHS_IN_YEAR,
            ],
            default=fpg_limit,
        )

The cent-precision step keeps ND 2026 (exactly $1,197.00) at $14,364.

In T/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml, change four expectations (and comments): line 173 (Case 7) to [29_868, 29_868]; line 294 (Case 12) to [21_636, 21_636]; line 337 (Case 14) to [27_216, 27_216, 20_124]; line 400 (Case 16) to [16_368, 16_368, 12_108].

Append three cases to T/is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yaml after the SA4 case. Case 18 is Case 17 named "New York senior one dollar a year above the published level does not qualify in 2026.", with ssi_countable_income: 22_033 and output false. All pass with the fix.

- name: Case 17, New York senior at the published 1,836 monthly level qualifies in 2026.
  period: 2026
  input:
    age: 70
    is_adult_for_medicaid: false
    is_optional_senior_or_disabled_for_medicaid: false
    is_ssi_recipient_for_medicaid: false
    ssi_countable_income: 22_032
    medicaid_medically_needy_medical_expenses: 0
    ssi_countable_resources: 1_000
    state_code: NY
  output:
    # GIS 26 MA/05: 1,836 x 12 = 22,032 (138% FPL is 1,835.40, rounded up).
    is_medically_needy_for_medicaid: true

- name: Case 19, Illinois couple above the published 1,803 monthly level does not qualify in 2026.
  period: 2026
  input:
    people:
      person1: {age: 70, is_tax_unit_head: true, is_adult_for_medicaid: false, is_optional_senior_or_disabled_for_medicaid: false, is_ssi_recipient_for_medicaid: false, ssi_countable_income: 21_640, medicaid_medically_needy_medical_expenses: 0, ssi_countable_resources: 1_000}
      person2: {age: 68, is_tax_unit_spouse: true, is_adult_for_medicaid: false, is_optional_senior_or_disabled_for_medicaid: false, is_ssi_recipient_for_medicaid: false, ssi_countable_income: 0, medicaid_medically_needy_medical_expenses: 0, ssi_countable_resources: 0}
    marital_units:
      marital_unit: {members: [person1, person2]}
    tax_units:
      tax_unit: {members: [person1, person2]}
    households:
      household: {members: [person1, person2], state_code: IL}
  output:
    # WAG 25-03-02(2): 1,803 x 12 = 21,636 (21,640 / 12 = 1,803.33, cents dropped).
    is_medically_needy_for_medicaid: [false, false]

Should Address

SA1. At this head, the test compares tax-unit income with a marital-unit limit.

• Where: E:26-28 (income and assets summed over the tax unit), E:31 (asset limit by tax_unit_is_joint), E:33 (income limit from V, sized by marital unit at V:23).
• Evidence: a NY 2026 married couple filing separately, each with $24,000 of countable income, is eligible at the head. Under either consistent unit it fails ($48,000 against $29,863.20; $24,000 against $22,024.80). The merge base and a tree merged with #10370 both give ineligible.
• Why SA: an entity mismatch that the declared dependency removes, so not critical; but nothing enforces the order on a MERGEABLE, green PR.
• Fix: retarget the base to #10370's branch (medicaid-medically-needy-blind-unit), or hold the merge until #10370 lands and rebase.

SA2. DC limits for 2019-2022 stay at $652, against 29 DCMR 901.1.

• Where: INC/individual.yaml:105-107 and INC/couple.yaml:105-107.
• Evidence: 29 DCMR 901.1 bases the levels on "50% of the respective amounts of the Federal poverty guidelines published each year", with one person at 95% of two (2003 table). The PR uses it for 2023-2026, and it reproduces KFF 2018's $652 and DHCF's 2023 and 2024 figures. But 2019-2022 stay at $652; in 2022 that is $72.77 a month low for one person and $110.92 for a couple.
• Why SA: the PR extends the DC series by a stated rule and leaves the rule unapplied for four years. Not critical: the 2018 line is unchanged context, and the body lists the gap.
• Fix (ran):

# INC/individual.yaml, DC, after 2018-01-01: 652
  2019-01-01: 669.35
  2020-01-01: 682.42
  2021-01-01: 689.54
  2022-01-01: 724.77
# INC/couple.yaml, DC, after 2018-01-01: 652
  # NOTE: KFF 2018 reports DC's own $652 for couples; the 29 DCMR 901.1 method applies from 2019.
  2019-01-01: 704.58
  2020-01-01: 718.33
  2021-01-01: 725.83
  2022-01-01: 762.92

Append to T/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml (passes), and update the body's DC limitation line:

- name: Case 22, District of Columbia couple and individual limits from 2019 to 2022 follow 29 DCMR 901.1.
  period: 2022
  absolute_error_margin: 0.01
  input:
    people:
      person1: {age: 70}
      person2: {age: 68}
      person3: {age: 74}
    marital_units:
      marital_unit1: {members: [person1, person2]}
      marital_unit2: {members: [person3]}
    tax_units:
      tax_unit1: {members: [person1, person2]}
      tax_unit2: {members: [person3]}
    households:
      household:
        members: [person1, person2, person3]
        state_code: {2019: DC, 2020: DC, 2021: DC, 2022: DC}
  output:
    # Couple: 50% of the two-person guideline / 12; individual: 95% of that.
    medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit:
      2019: [8_454.96, 8_454.96, 8_032.2]
      2020: [8_619.96, 8_619.96, 8_189.04]
      2021: [8_709.96, 8_709.96, 8_274.48]
      2022: [9_155.04, 9_155.04, 8_697.24]

SA3. The only source for Wisconsin's 2019-09-01 date is a dead link.

• Where: INC/fpg_rate.yaml:43-44, which supports INC/fpg_rate.yaml:62-64.
• Evidence: the live Ops Memo 19-26 URL returns HTTP 404. The Wayback capture of 2025-10-31 returns the memo; page 2 gives 100 percent of the FPL "Effective September 1, 2019". The other WI references give no date.
• Why SA: the document exists and corroborates the value, so this is a broken link, not a missing source.
• Fix (ran; files load), at INC/fpg_rate.yaml:44:

      href: https://web.archive.org/web/20251031224345id_/https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/dms/memos/ops/dms-ops-2019-26.pdf#page=2

SA4. The tests do not pin several values and dates that the PR adds or makes live, or the marital-unit rule.

• Where: AR, IA and NJ at lines 90-91, 119-120 and 154-155 of INC/individual.yaml and INC/couple.yaml; INC/fpg_rate.yaml:53, 56; AST/individual.yaml:67-69 and AST/couple.yaml:67-69; CAT/senior.yaml:55-56; V:21-23.
• Evidence: each change passes all 41 cases: AR $108.33 back to $108 (this PR's own change); other AR, NJ and IA values; the ND 90% and MN 100% dates moved a year; the IL asset date and senior flag moved to 2025; is_couple from tax_unit_is_joint (every existing case has marital unit = tax unit).
• Why SA: missing edge cases for variables that already have tests.
• Fix (ran: each case passes and fails on the change it targets). Values include C1; without it, Case 20's ND values are 12_101.4 and 13_554, and Case 21 is [29_863.2, 29_863.2, 22_024.8]. Append to T/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml:

- name: Case 19, Arkansas, Iowa and New Jersey couple and individual dollar limits in 2026.
  period: 2026
  absolute_error_margin: 0.01
  input:
    people:
      person1: {age: 70}
      person2: {age: 68}
      person3: {age: 74}
      person4: {age: 70}
      person5: {age: 68}
      person6: {age: 74}
      person7: {age: 70}
      person8: {age: 68}
      person9: {age: 74}
    marital_units:
      marital_unit1: {members: [person1, person2]}
      marital_unit2: {members: [person3]}
      marital_unit3: {members: [person4, person5]}
      marital_unit4: {members: [person6]}
      marital_unit5: {members: [person7, person8]}
      marital_unit6: {members: [person9]}
    tax_units:
      tax_unit1: {members: [person1, person2]}
      tax_unit2: {members: [person3]}
      tax_unit3: {members: [person4, person5]}
      tax_unit4: {members: [person6]}
      tax_unit5: {members: [person7, person8]}
      tax_unit6: {members: [person9]}
    households:
      household1: {members: [person1, person2, person3], state_code: AR}
      household2: {members: [person4, person5, person6], state_code: IA}
      household3: {members: [person7, person8, person9], state_code: NJ}
  output:
    # AR: 216.66 / 108.33 x 12; IA: 483 / 483 x 12; NJ: 434 / 367 x 12.
    medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit: [2_599.92, 2_599.92, 1_299.96, 5_796, 5_796, 5_796, 5_208, 5_208, 4_404]

- name: Case 20, North Dakota uses 90 percent of the poverty guideline from 2024 and Minnesota 100 percent from 2023.
  period: 2024
  absolute_error_margin: 0.01
  input:
    people:
      person1: {age: 70}
      person2: {age: 70}
    marital_units:
      marital_unit1: {members: [person1]}
      marital_unit2: {members: [person2]}
    tax_units:
      tax_unit1: {members: [person1]}
      tax_unit2: {members: [person2]}
    households:
      household1: {members: [person1], state_code: {2023: MN, 2024: MN}}
      household2: {members: [person2], state_code: {2023: ND, 2024: ND}}
  output:
    # [MN, ND]. 2023: 100% and 83% of 14,580 (ND 1,008.45 rounds up to 1,009 a month).
    # 2024: 100% and 90% of 15,060 (ND 1,129.50 rounds up to 1,130, ML 3896).
    medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit:
      2023: [14_580, 12_108]
      2024: [15_060, 13_560]

- name: Case 21, aged parent claimed as a dependent on a married child's joint return uses the individual limit.
  period: 2026
  absolute_error_margin: 0.01
  input:
    people:
      person1: {age: 50, is_tax_unit_head: true}
      person2: {age: 48, is_tax_unit_spouse: true}
      person3: {age: 78, is_tax_unit_dependent: true}
    marital_units:
      marital_unit1: {members: [person1, person2]}
      marital_unit2: {members: [person3]}
    tax_units:
      tax_unit: {members: [person1, person2, person3]}
    households:
      household: {members: [person1, person2, person3], state_code: NY}
  output:
    # 42 CFR 435.602: the unit is the individual or married couple, not the tax unit.
    # person3 is unmarried: 1.38 x 15,960 / 12 = 1,835.40, rounded up to 1,836, x 12.
    medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit: [29_868, 29_868, 22_032]

Append to T/is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yaml:

- name: Case 16, Illinois senior with assets at the 17,500 limit qualifies in 2024.
  period: 2024
  input:
    age: 70
    is_adult_for_medicaid: false
    is_optional_senior_or_disabled_for_medicaid: false
    is_ssi_recipient_for_medicaid: false
    ssi_countable_income: 20_000
    medicaid_medically_needy_medical_expenses: 6_000
    ssi_countable_resources: 17_500
    state_code: IL
  output:
    # Limit 15,060 (100% FPG, 2024). 20,000 - 6,000 = 14,000; assets 17,500 equal
    # the limit from 2023-05-12, first read in 2024 (PM 07-02-01).
    is_in_medicaid_medically_needy_category: true
    is_medically_needy_for_medicaid: true

SA5. Four new parameter descriptions do not follow the one-sentence format.

• Where: INC/fpg_rate.yaml:1 and INC/ssi_rate.yaml:1 (two sentences); INC/individual.yaml:1 and INC/couple.yaml:1 (end with formula mechanics).
• Evidence: the repo's parameter rule asks for one sentence that ends "under the [program name] program".
• Why SA: formatting.
• Fix (ran; files load):

# INC/fpg_rate.yaml
description: States set the medically needy income limit at this share of the federal poverty guideline for a household of one or two under the Medicaid program.
# NOTE: States not listed, or with a share of zero, use the dollar limits in individual.yaml and couple.yaml.
# INC/ssi_rate.yaml: the same, with "the Supplemental Security Income federal benefit rate" in place of the guideline phrase.
# INC/individual.yaml (couple.yaml: "for a couple")
description: States limit monthly income for an individual to this amount under the Medicaid medically needy program.
# NOTE: From the date a state's fpg_rate or ssi_rate is positive, the formula uses that rate instead of this amount.

Suggestions

G1. Minnesota and Utah rounding is not confirmed; correct the body's claim.

• Where: the body's Limitations ("MN, NY and ND round up"); INC/fpg_rate.yaml:50-53 and :60-61.
• Evidence: MN's DHS-3461A could not be retrieved, and UT's policy gives "100% of the Federal Poverty Level" with no table. Only KFF 2026 shows UT at $1,804 for two ($1,803.33 at 100%).
• Why G: inconclusive; no flip is proved for MN or UT.
• Fix: keep MN and UT unrounded (C1 lists only ND, NY and IL). Change the body line to "NY and ND round up; IL drops cents; WI keeps cents; MN and UT are not confirmed." Add a state to rounds_up_monthly.yaml only with a primary table.

G2. Cite the North Dakota documents that carry the 90% date.

• Where: INC/fpg_rate.yaml:31-32 (SPA ND-23-0034), which supports INC/fpg_rate.yaml:56.
• Evidence: SPA ND-23-0034 page 5 sets 90% for "AFDC-related medically needy groups" only. ML 3776 page 1 (effective January 1, 2024) makes ACA medically needy the same as Non-ACA at 90%, so ABD was 90% by then.
• Why G: the date is right and corroborated; this improves the trail.
• Fix (not run; both links resolve):

    - title: North Dakota Manual Letter 3776, ACA Medically Needy (effective January 1, 2024)
      href: https://www.nd.gov/dhs/policymanuals/51003/Content/ML/2023/ML%203776%20-ACA%20Med%20Needy.pdf#page=1
    - title: North Dakota Non-ACA Medicaid Manual 510-05-85-40 (archived, ML 3896), 90% of poverty from April 1, 2024
      href: https://www.nd.gov/dhs/policymanuals/51005/Archived%20Documents/2025/3896/510_05_85_40.htm

G3. Name draft #10394 in the body, and agree on the North Dakota encoding.

• Where: the body's "Merge after #10370" paragraph.
• Evidence: #10394 edits the same four parameter files and adds ND dollars from 2025-04-01 ($1,174 / $1,587) and 2026-04-01 that this PR replaces with 90% FPL. Its tests expect calendar 2026 at $1,174, but this PR gives $1,197, so a case fails after a rebase.
• Why G: coordination only.
• Fix: add one line to the body, and agree on one ND encoding with #10394.

G4. Document the Illinois rules that the switch-on does not model.

• Where: CAT/senior.yaml:55-56 and CAT/disabled.yaml:55-56; E:39.
• Evidence: PM 15-08-00 starts spenddown when income "and/or nonexempt resources" exceed the limits; the model applies a hard asset test. PM 15-06-02-c (INC/fpg_rate.yaml:13-14) counts everyone in the home when the client has children under 18; the model caps the unit at two. Both understate IL eligibility.
• Why G: the one-or-two unit is a model-wide limit, and the body can document both gaps.
• Fix: add both to the body's Limitations, or to follow-up issue #10472.

G5. Cite N.J.A.C. 10:70 for New Jersey, and note the narrower benefit package.

• Where: the NJ references at CAT/senior.yaml:18-19, CAT/disabled.yaml:18-19, and lines 11-12 of the four AST/ and INC/ dollar files.
• Evidence: the only NJ source is an undated fact sheet (values match KFF). N.J.A.C. 10:70-1.2 and 10:70-5.1 set up the program and its resource limits. The fact sheet's package excludes inpatient hospital care and prescribed drugs, but medicaid values these enrollees at the full per-capita cost.
• Why G: the values are corroborated; this adds the rule and one limitation.
• Fix (not run; links resolve), and add the benefit-package line to the body's Limitations:

    - title: N.J.A.C. 10:70-1.2 - Purpose of the Medically Needy Manual
      href: https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/new-jersey/N-J-A-C-10-70-1-2
    - title: N.J.A.C. 10:70-5.1 - Resource eligibility limits
      href: https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/new-jersey/N-J-A-C-10-70-5-1

G6. Cite GIS 22 MA/01 for New York's 2022 values.

• Where: INC/individual.yaml:160-162, INC/couple.yaml:160-162, AST/individual.yaml:108-110 and AST/couple.yaml:108-110.
• Evidence: GIS 22 MA/01 attachment page 2 lists $934 / $1,367 and $16,800 / $24,600 effective January 1, 2022; GIS 22 MA/11 refers to them only after the fact.
• Why G: the values are right; this is a better source.
• Fix (not run; link resolves):

    - title: New York DOH GIS 22 MA/01, Attachment I, 2022 SSI-Related Medicaid Income and Resource Levels
      href: https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/publications/docs/gis/22ma01_att1.pdf#page=2

G7. The five new switches start in 2015, but the limits they gate start in 2018.

• Where: AR, IA, IL, ND and NJ at CAT/senior.yaml:29-30, 50-51, 55-56, 84-85, 90-91 and the same lines of CAT/disabled.yaml.
• Evidence: 2015-2017 use the 2018 values (AR $1,300 a year; IL 100% FPG; ND 83% FPG).
• Why G: every other state has the same pattern, and AR's program text is dated 01/01/14.
• Fix: add a one-line NOTE, or date the five new flags 2018-01-01.

G8. The dollar fallback for IL, MN, ND, UT and WA is now $0.

• Where: INC/individual.yaml and INC/couple.yaml, which no longer list these states.
• Evidence: an unlisted state reads 0, so a reform that sets one of these states' rate to 0 gives a $0 limit.
• Why G: baseline results do not change.
• Fix: keep the 2018 dollar entries, or say in the SA5 NOTE that these states have none.

G9. Readability.

• V:24 names Washington in generic code. Use # Some states apply the one-person limit to a couple.
• T/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml has double blank lines after several cases (for example lines 81-82, 174-175, 295-296). Use one.
• Why G: style only.

Investigated and cleared

• DC 2018 couple. The 29 DCMR 901.1 method gives $685.83, but KFF 2018, the file's original source, records DC's own $652 / $652. The sources conflict, so 2018 stays.
• The ND 90% date as a reference defect. Partly right: the cited SPA amends only AFDC-related groups, but ML 3776 and ML 3896 carry the date (G2).
• An earlier rounding fix (round up MN, ND, NY, UT; not IL, WI). Partly right: IL drops cents; MN and UT lack a primary table. C1 replaces it.
• SA1 as critical. It lasts only until the declared prerequisite merges, so SA.
• Rate limits above the federal cap. KS, NY, UT and WA use a 1902(r)(2) disregard; encoding the effective limit gives the same result.
• Missing keys and branch order. Unlisted states read 0, and no state has both rates, so both are safe.
• A child's spend-down. E:26-28 still sums over the tax unit, as on main; that is #10370's scope.

Out of scope / follow-up

• Named in the body: MA (KFF 2026: 100% FPL, against $522 / $650), MI (#8453), LA and VA regional limits, VT's Chittenden PIL, #10472, #10473, #10375 and #10378.
• Documented simplifications: mid-year dates apply from the next January; MN's July COLA disregard; NY 2019-2021 and VT 2019 keep the 2018 values.

Validation Summary

Check	Result
CI and local tests	CI 33 pass, 0 fail. Medically needy folder 41/41 at both heads; Medicaid folder 728 at c1b120a6ed
Fix runs at the head	C1 and SA2-SA5 together: medically needy 49/49, boundary probe 5/5, Medicaid 753/753, partner healthcare 70/70 (read-only; no partner file edited)
References and law	74 links, 73 resolve (WI dead, SA3); 112 values match; rounding (C1); DC 2019-2022 (SA2)
Code and mutation	No hard-coded values; vectorized. 22 mutations: 9 killed, SA4 kills 10 more, 3 left immaterial
Merge trials	#10370: Python clean, two test files conflict, resolved tree 47/47, SA1 correct after merge
Microsimulation (2026, at c1b120a6ed)	Medically needy eligible +517,100 (to 919,635); NY +359,286 (not re-checked); switch-ons +34,600; switch-offs 0
Branch	8 ahead / 6 behind main; MERGEABLE
PR body, other reviews	Accurate, apart from G1 and G3. axiom: line present (process note, not counted). No other reviews

Review Severity: REQUEST_CHANGES

One critical item (C1: missing rounding that flips eligibility at the published NY, ND and IL limits) and five should-address items are open.

Next Steps

To auto-fix issues: run the fix-pr workflow for this PR.

1. Apply C1: the two rounding flags, the formula change, four updated expectations and three boundary cases.
2. Apply SA2 (DC 2019-2022 and its test), SA3 (WI link), SA4 (four test cases) and SA5 (descriptions).
3. Take the suggestions you agree with, and update the body for G1, G3, G4 and G5.
4. Run make format, then the medically needy and Medicaid test folders.
5. Merge after #10370 has its fix (SA1), resolve the two test files as the body says, then rebase #10375.

[hua7450]

Thanks, Pavel. Round 1 is applied at 33d10a5. That head also merges main at b210b45 (3a8bf04), which brings in #10370. Tests were not run locally; CI will.

Paths as in your review: VAR/ = policyengine_us/variables/gov/hhs/medicaid/eligibility/categories/medically_needy/, MN/ = policyengine_us/parameters/gov/hhs/medicaid/eligibility/categories/medically_needy/, INC/ = MN/limit/income/, AST/ = MN/limit/assets/, CAT/ = MN/categories/, T/ = policyengine_us/tests/policy/baseline/gov/hhs/medicaid/eligibility/categories/medically_needy/.

Item	Status	Where
C1	Fixed. Your rounds_up_monthly (ND, NY) and rounds_down_monthly (IL from 2023) are in, along with the cent-precision rounding block. The four expectations now read [29_868, 29_868], [21_636, 21_636], [27_216, 27_216, 20_124] and [16_368, 16_368, 12_108], with comments. Your boundary cases are added: NY at $22,032 and $22,033, and the IL couple at $21,640. I re-read IL's WAG 25-03-02(2) table ($1,803 for two). The NY GIS PDFs return 403 to my fetch, so I relied on your reading for the NY and ND amounts.	INC/rounds_up_monthly.yaml, INC/rounds_down_monthly.yaml; VAR/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.py:34-48; T/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml:149, 267, 301, 367; T/is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yaml:658, 673, 688
SA1	Resolved by the merge. main now has #10370, so income, expenses, resources and both limits use the marital unit. The two conflicting test files keep main's cases first. This PR's spend-down cases are now Cases 11-23, and this round's are Cases 24-27; the category file is main's Cases 1-2, then this PR's Cases 3-4.	VAR/is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.py (as merged)
SA2	Fixed. DC 2019-2022 under 29 DCMR 901.1, with your NOTE on the 2018 couple value, and your Case 22. The body's DC line is updated.	INC/individual.yaml:112-117; INC/couple.yaml:112-118; T/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml:550
SA3	Fixed. Wayback link for Ops Memo 19-26 (returns 200).	INC/fpg_rate.yaml:49
SA4	Fixed. Your Cases 19-21 in the income-limit file (AR, IA and NJ dollars; ND 90% and MN 100% dates; the aged parent on a married child's return), and the IL asset case as Case 24.	T/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml:471, 507, 530; T/is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yaml:641
SA5	Fixed. One-sentence descriptions, with the mechanics moved to # NOTE lines.	INC/individual.yaml:1-2, INC/couple.yaml:1-2, INC/fpg_rate.yaml:1-2, INC/ssi_rate.yaml:1-2
G1	Done. MN and UT stay unrounded. The body now says NY and ND round up, IL drops cents, WI keeps cents, and MN and UT are not confirmed.	PR body, Limitations
G2	Done. ML 3776 and the archived 510-05-85-40 (ML 3896).	INC/fpg_rate.yaml:34-37
G3	Done in the body. #10394 is named under Out of scope: it encodes ND dollars from 2025-04-01 while this PR uses 90% FPL rounded up ($1,197 / $1,623 in 2026), so the two need one ND encoding before #10394 merges.	PR body
G4	Done in the body. Limitations now cover IL's resource spend-down (PM 15-08-00) and the household with children under 18 (PM 15-06-02-c).	PR body
G5	Done. N.J.A.C. 10:70-1.2 and 10:70-5.1 on all six NJ-referencing files, and the narrower benefit package is in the body's Limitations.	CAT/senior.yaml:21, CAT/disabled.yaml:21, INC/{individual,couple}.yaml:14, AST/{individual,couple}.yaml:13
G6	Done. GIS 22 MA/01 Attachment I on the four NY files.	INC/{individual,couple}.yaml:52, AST/{individual,couple}.yaml:29
G7	Done (NOTE). One line in each category file on the 2015 switch date and the 2018 limits.	CAT/senior.yaml:2, CAT/disabled.yaml:2
G8	Done (NOTE). The SA5 NOTE says IL, MN, ND, UT and WA use a rate from 2018 and have no dollar entry.	INC/individual.yaml:2, INC/couple.yaml:2
G9	Done. The generic comment, and no double blank lines between cases.	VAR/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.py:24; T/medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml

The changelog fragment now covers the rounding and DC. TheAxiomFoundation/rulespec-us#1938 is updated to this head.