Repository navigation
Conversation
West Virginia's SSI-Related/Non-Cash Assistance group (IMM § 23.11.4) covers aged, blind, and disabled people whose countable income is within the SSI Maximum Payment level (Chapter 4 Appendix A: $994 / $1,491 in 2026), not 75% of the poverty guideline. Income equal to the level qualifies, following § 4.14.3 Step 5 and SSI's "not more than" test. Part of PolicyEngine#9734 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
4 tasks done
N.D.A.C. 75-02-02.1-40(1)(a)(2) sets the income level for categorically needy aged, blind, or disabled recipients at the level "which establishes supplemental security income eligibility" (same text in the February 2017 edition), so the limit is the SSI individual or couple rate, not 75% of the poverty guideline. North Dakota is a 209(b) state, and the 209(b) SSI-recipient income test reads the same limit. Recipient liability is net income remaining after the level (75-02-02.1-41.1), so income equal to the level qualifies. Part of PolicyEngine#9734 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The case now runs through is_209b_ssi_recipient_for_medicaid with SSI receipt, and no longer appends to the file that PolicyEngine#10378 also extends. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
hua7450
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 22, 2026 21:36
…into medicaid-abd-wv-ssi-rate-standard
7 tasks done
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #9734. #9735 made the same change for CO, IA, LA, MT, OH, OR and WA. #10361 keeps West Virginia's optional aged, blind and disabled group on and leaves its income standard to this PR. It also leaves North Dakota on and lists ND's 209(b) standard under the rest of #9734; this PR covers that standard too.
What and why
Both states set the income level for aged, blind and disabled Medicaid at the SSI payment level: $994 a month for one person and $1,491 for a couple in 2026. The model used 0.75 of the poverty guideline for both.
uses_ssi_federal_benefit_rate: WV and ND are now true from 2018-01-01.income/limit/individual.yamlandcouple.yaml: WV's and ND's 0.75 entries are removed. Use the SSI rate as the aged/disabled Medicaid income limit in MT, CO, IA, LA, OH, OR and WA #9735 removed the seven states' entries the same way, and these files say SSI-rate states are omitted.requires_income_below_limit: WV and ND stay false, so income equal to the SSI rate qualifies (see below). The file now cites both states' sources.medicaid_optional_senior_or_disabled_income_limitalready reads the flag.In 2026 the individual limit falls from $11,970 to $11,928 a year. The couple limit rises from $16,230 to $17,892, because 75% of the two-person guideline is below the SSI couple rate.
West Virginia
West Virginia covers aged, blind and disabled people who don't receive SSI through its "SSI-Related/Non-Cash Assistance" group. West Virginia is a 1634 state, so the 209(b) path does not apply.
Each source was read on 2026-10-21. The current manual is the consolidated PDF dated 2026-10-05. Page numbers are PDF file pages.
Income exactly at the standard
Two passages of the manual read differently:
This PR follows Step 5, along with SSI's own income test: income "at a rate of not more than" the benefit rate (42 U.S.C. 1382(a)(1)(A) and (2)(A); POMS SI 02005.001.C.3). #9735 treated Colorado and Iowa the same way. The manual uses "under" the same way for the medically needy limit: § 23.11.3 says "under the Medically Needy Income Limit (MNIL)", while § 4.14.3 Step 6 makes income "equal to or less than the appropriate MNIL" eligible without a spenddown.
North Dakota
North Dakota is a 209(b) state.
is_209b_ssi_recipient_income_eligible_for_medicaidtests SSI recipients against the same limit, so the flag also corrects that test. SSI couples with countable income between $1,353 and $1,491 a month now qualify without spenddown.Each source was read on 2026-10-22.
Coverage for people who don't receive SSI is not changed here. N.D.A.C. 75-02-02.1-05 puts aged, blind or disabled SSI recipients in the categorically needy group ((1)(n)). Those "who are not in receipt of supplemental security income" are in the medically needy group ((3)(e)), with an income level of 90% of the poverty guideline. The model still runs ND's optional non-SSI pathway; this PR only moves its individual limit from $998 to $994 a month. Turning that pathway off belongs with #10361's
covers_non_ssi_recipients.Readers checked
is_optional_senior_or_disabled_for_medicaidandmedicaid_categoryfollow the new limit.is_209b_ssi_recipient_income_eligible_for_medicaidalso reads the income test. In ND it now uses the SSI rate. In WV it doesn't apply, because WV is a 1634 state (section_209bfalse).Test plan
is_optional_senior_or_disabled_income_eligible.yaml:is_209b_ssi_recipient_for_medicaid.yaml, Case 18: an ND SSI couple with $1,400 a month of combined countable income qualifies without spenddown.test_medicaid_abd_ssi_rate_standard_properties.py: WV and ND are added toSSI_RATE_STATES, so the existing property tests cover both for 2018-2026. They check that:ruff format --checkon the changed Python file.changelog.d/.No partner test has a West Virginia or North Dakota household. Test merges with #10361 and #10378 are clean. The microsimulation impact was not run.
Not changed here
🤖 Generated with Claude Code