Skip to content

[P1 exact] Spiral cancellation in both-same x both-same is config-wise: cardinality-only via set identity (#674) - #683

Draft
LightChainr wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue674-spiral-involution
Draft

[P1 exact] Spiral cancellation in both-same x both-same is config-wise: cardinality-only via set identity (#674)#683
LightChainr wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue674-spiral-involution

Conversation

@LightChainr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Closes nothing; deliverable for #674 (parent #650). Draft — do not merge.

Outcome

cardinality-only, sharpened: the equal cardinality is set identity, and D = 0 on both-same × both-same is config-wise — no involution pairing is needed.

  1. Colour-flip kill at L=4 (recorded first, as instructed). [120, 416, 448, 128, 8] over k = 8..12 is not palindromic under k ↔ 16−k (mirror masses at k′=7,6,5,4 are all 0). Structural form: a rank-1 both-same spiral needs k ≥ 2L on the primal lattice (min k brute-forced: 6 at L=3, 8 at L=4), so the complement — with black/white and primal/matching roles preserved — is never rank-1 × rank-1. Verified at L=3: all 6 complements land on black none / white both-same rank 2. The L=3 "survival" of colour-flip was a window-position accident.

  2. L=3 2^9 dump (Mac-OK). The 6 question-cell configs are k=6 diagonal staircases (occupancy lists in results/issue674-spiral-involution/axis-L3-spiral-dump.json). In every one, either = 1 on both sides: each config carries its own +1 and −1, D(C) = 0 term-by-term.

  3. Set identity, not equal counts. Black-side rank-1 both-same and white-side rank-1 both-same are the same configuration set: 6 = 6 = 6 at L=3; 1120 = 1120 = 1120 at L=4 with identical per-k masses. Conjecture (mechanism): matching-lattice self-duality of the diagonal-winding event — verified as identity at L=3,4 only.

  4. Fixed-point-free involutions exist but are epiphenomenal. All 33 (L=3) / 56 (L=4) candidate torus self-maps tested: refl-x(2c−x) and refl-y(2c−y) for every c are fixed-point-free k-preserving involutions on the cell (orbits e.g. {0,2},{1,3},{4,5} at L=3; 10 such maps at L=4 incl. translations (0,2),(2,0)). 90° rotations and translations are not involutions on the cell. None is needed for D = 0.

  5. Q3: both-two = 0 is independent and structural. An x-wrapping and a y-wrapping cluster have homology-intersection number 1, so they cannot be disjoint — they merge into a single both-same cluster. Exhaustively verified (0 violations): L=2 primal 5/matching 7, L=3 primal 97/matching 265, L=4 primal 10165/matching 37679 configs with x-wrap ∧ y-wrap, all both-same. So A-continues is forced by the mechanism, independent of §3.

Provenance / budgets

  • PR [P1 exact] Joint dictionary: rank pair x wrapping-type x 5-names at axis L=3,4 (#665) #668 joint census imported, not recomputed (imported-issue668-*.json + provenance record); ticket integers re-derived bit-for-bit from the import.
  • L=4 2^16 fresh stream: 2.6 s — seconds-scale, permitted by the ticket gate.
  • L=5: NOT run — NEED_HUAWEI.
  • Script scripts/issue674_spiral_involution.py; test tests/test_issue674_spiral_involution.py (axis L=2,3, direct-run, 5/5 pass); notes notes/issue-674-spiral-involution-20260908.md.

Integers only. No docs/STATUS.md edit; no ticket closed. Related: #635, #651, #665, #650, PRs #668, #662.

…dentity)

Colour-flip kill at L=4 recorded first: masses [120,416,448,128,8] over
k=8..12 are not palindromic under k <-> 16-k; structurally the complement
of a rank-1 both-same spiral (k >= 2L on primal) is never rank-1 x rank-1.

L=3 2^9 dump: the 6 spirals are k=6 diagonal staircases; every one has
either=1 on both sides, so D=0 config-wise. The rank-1 both-same class is
the SAME set of configs on black and white (6=6=6 at L=3; 1120=1120=1120
at L=4, identical per-k masses) - set identity, not equal counts.

Fixed-point-free involutions exist anyway (refl-x/refl-y, all c; 6 at L=3,
10 at L=4 incl. translations (0,2),(2,0)) but are epiphenomenal.

both-two = 0 is independent and structural: x-wrapping and y-wrapping
clusters have intersection number 1, so they merge (exhaustively verified
L=2,3,4, both lattices; 0 violations).

Artifacts: #668 JSON imported with provenance (no census redo); L=4 2^16
stream ran in 2.6s (seconds-scale gate); L=5 NOT run (NEED_HUAWEI).
Tests: axis L=2,3, direct-run, all pass.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Verification comment, not a merge request. Ticket stays open.

Tripwires from #674 hold: colour-flip kill recorded first (L=4 masses not palindromic); L=3 2^9 dump of the 6 staircases; L=4 2^16 in 2.6s (Mac-OK); L=5 not run (NEED_HUAWEI); #668 imported not recomputed; no STATUS.

Science I will keep:

  • D=0 is config-wise on both-same × both-same because either=1 on both sides — arithmetic, not a pairing.
  • Colour-flip is dead at L=4 and does not even preserve rank-1×rank-1 at L=3 (complements land on black none / white rank-2).
  • Q3 is the real theorem: algebraic intersection 1 ⇒ an x-cluster and a y-cluster cannot be disjoint ⇒ both-two=0 structurally, independent of the spiral cell. That is A-continues as a mechanism, checked exhaustively at L=2,3,4.

Caveats:

Do not close #674 / #651 / #665.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant