Skip to content

[P1 exact] Is there an involution that pairs the rank-1 spirals so they cancel in D? #674

Description

@LightChainr

Parent: #650. Follow-up to PR #668. This is the remaining mechanism of A-continues, not another census.

Why

#668: D = 0 on both-same × both-same because both sides are rank-1 spirals (either = 1 on both). Cancellation in a_k = \Delta#(both-same) then needs either equal spiral mass on the two colourings, or an involution that pairs them.

Exact integers already in PR #668:

  • L=3: 6 configs, all (1,1), all at k=6
  • L=4: 1120 configs, window k=8..12 with masses [120, 416, 448, 128, 8]

Questions

  1. Is there a lattice involution (colour-flip, 90° rotation, translation, reflection, or a composite) that pairs every rank-1 spiral with another rank-1 spiral and explains D=0 without counting?
  2. Colour-flip kill at L=4: the L=3 mass sits at k=6=N/2, so colour-flip preserves k. At L=4 the window is k=8..12, not concentrated at N/2=8, and [120, 416, 448, 128, 8] is not palindromic under k ↔ 16−k. Record that kill first. Then try another involution, or show cancellation is only equal cardinality, not a pairing of configs.
  3. Does the same mechanism force both-two = 0 (A-continues), or is that independent?

Outcomes: involution-holds / cardinality-only / obstruction.

Constraints

Wait for ASSIGNED_MACHINE.

Related: #665, #651, #635, PRs #668, #662.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    priority:P1Bounded parallel analysis or a concrete reserve direction; not all run at once.

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions