Skip to content

Build OTel operator images - #12255

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
dinesh.gurumurthy/add-otel-operator-image
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

Build OTel operator images#12255
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
dinesh.gurumurthy/add-otel-operator-image

Conversation

@dineshg13

@dineshg13 dineshg13 commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What Does This Do

Incorporate libdatadogbuild 1.5.0 that allows us to build images that can be directly used with OTel operator.

@datadog-prod-us1-5

datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 59.02% (-0.02%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 7053e48 | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 14.01 s 13.88 s [+0.1%; +1.8%] (maybe worse)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 12.90 s 12.97 s [-1.2%; +0.2%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 16.89 s 17.44 s [-7.3%; +1.0%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 17.45 s 17.00 s [-1.7%; +6.9%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 17.49 s 17.30 s [+0.1%; +2.0%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 17.57 s 17.39 s [+0.0%; +2.0%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.51 s 16.61 s [-1.5%; +0.2%] (no difference)

Commit: 7053e480 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@dineshg13
dineshg13 marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2026 15:44
@dineshg13
dineshg13 requested review from a team as code owners September 8, 2026 15:44
@dineshg13
dineshg13 requested review from bric3 and erikayasuda and removed request for a team September 8, 2026 15:44
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-08T15:47:18.708909Z 7053e48 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! 👋 Thanks for your pull request! 🎉

To help us review it, please make sure to:

  • Add at least one type, and one component or instrumentation label to the pull request

If you need help, please check our contributing guidelines.

@datadog-prod-us1-5 datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The 1.5.0 pipeline include uses the new OTel Operator variables for Java image jobs. The changed lines have no concrete failure mode.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 7053e48 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD AlexeyKuznetsov-DD added type: bug fix Bug fix tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes comp: tooling Build & Tooling labels Sep 8, 2026
@mcculls mcculls added type: feature Enhancements and improvements and removed type: bug fix Bug fix labels Sep 8, 2026
@dineshg13
dineshg13 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 8, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-08 16:44:55 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-09-08 16:45:01 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-09-08 17:44:55 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 8, 2026
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit bc61014 into master Sep 8, 2026
631 of 639 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the dinesh.gurumurthy/add-otel-operator-image branch September 8, 2026 17:44
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Sep 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

comp: tooling Build & Tooling tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes type: feature Enhancements and improvements

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants