Skip to content

fix(audit): prevent scans crashing on non-import provider bindings - #267

Merged
zrk222 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/fresh431-baseline-20261031
Oct 31, 2026
Merged

zrk222 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/fresh431-baseline-20261031

Conversation

@zrk222

@zrk222 zrk222 commented Oct 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

A normal security scan could crash when a shadowed provider name was represented by a non-import AST binding. The shared namespace resolver now rejects those bindings before reading import-specific fields; valid import resolution stays unchanged.

Validation: six reproduced crash shapes now pass; all 240 affected constructor/provider tests pass. The previously failing captured repository passes the public CLI and unchanged independent receipt verifier. Ruff, C901, formatting, strict architecture and hash-bound workflow audit pass. No new recognizer, helper, module, dependency or cap change. The original frozen baseline remains recorded as incomplete; this is not a precision claim.

Reviewed with sol-loop: 1 round with GPT-6.1 Sol on high. Sol verdict: approved.

Created with Codex.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 51cfd8f8-56ea-444e-b3ea-b800e70411e8
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

FactoryLine Proof Review

Commit: 4bb1560a368dc57b7a7e8edb1841edcdeaf36cb2
Diff-to-Proof Review SHA-256: 3f3e7902f56d1b79b49d2e764fe9ec080e77af7845cc74502c0116cd34f25ce7
Proof Review SHA-256: cf169bfd5246bf987f2ff3f3ed4517b1d99bc43475c29146d5695cfd9b0efc44

Changed-scope walkthrough

  • Implementation — factoryline/credential_role_constructor_provider.py
  • Other — plans/shared-security-evidence.md
  • Tests — tests/test_credential_constructor_cache.py

Fact-derived next action

  • bind_changed_path_to_proof — This changed path has no explicit Graph Ops proof-input edge.

Findings

  • blocking unmatched_changed_path — This changed path has no explicit Graph Ops proof-input edge.

Unproven claims

  • No explicit proof-input edge is declared for factoryline/credential_role_constructor_provider.py.
  • No explicit proof-input edge is declared for plans/shared-security-evidence.md.
  • No explicit proof-input edge is declared for tests/test_credential_constructor_cache.py.
  • Pattern and guard-path audit state: not_configured; no runtime correctness or release approval is implied.

Authority boundary

Advisory only. This payload has no execution, approval, publication, deployment, signing, messaging, credential, connector, source write, test execution, repair authority. It does not use CodeRabbit credentials, interpret AI comments as proof, approve, merge, or modify source.

Existing Diff-to-Proof map

flowchart LR
  REVIEW["Diff-to-Proof Review"]
  C1["Changed: factoryline/credential_role_constructor_provider.py"]
  C1 --> REVIEW
  C2["Changed: plans/shared-security-evidence.md"]
  C2 --> REVIEW
  C3["Changed: tests/test_credential_constructor_cache.py"]
  C3 --> REVIEW
  U1["Unmatched: factoryline/credential_role_constructor_provider.py"]
  REVIEW --> U1
  U2["Unmatched: plans/shared-security-evidence.md"]
  REVIEW --> U2
  U3["Unmatched: tests/test_credential_constructor_cache.py"]
  REVIEW --> U3
  F1["unmatched_changed_path"]
  REVIEW --> F1
Loading

@zrk222
zrk222 enabled auto-merge October 31, 2026 06:03
@zrk222
zrk222 merged commit 70b2f7c into main Oct 31, 2026
45 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant