Skip to content

Add Zabbix source with Tags support - #3838

Open
SerWax wants to merge 7 commits into
ytti:masterfrom
SER-S-p-A:zabbix-tags
Open

Add Zabbix source with Tags support#3838
SerWax wants to merge 7 commits into
ytti:masterfrom
SER-S-p-A:zabbix-tags

Conversation

@SerWax

@SerWax SerWax commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pre-Request Checklist

  • Passes rubocop code analysis (try rubocop --auto-correct)
  • Tests added or adapted (try rake test)
  • Changes are reflected in the documentation
  • User-visible changes appended to CHANGELOG.md

Description

Closes issue #3818 and fixes #3837

SerWax added 7 commits June 3, 2026 20:02
Nodes can be sourced from Zabbix API. In Zabbix, add or modify template with the Macros that you then specify in Oxidized config. Example: 
source:
  default: zabbix
  zabbix:
    url: "https://zabbix.yourdomain.com/api_jsonrpc.php"
    token: "yourzabbixapitoken"
    template: "Cisco IOS by SNMP"
    map:
      username: "{$OXIDIZED_USERNAME}"
      password: "{$OXIDIZED_PASSWORD}"
      model:    "{$OXIDIZED_MODEL}"
    vars_map:
      group:  "{$OXIDIZED_GROUP}"
#      enable: "{$OXIDIZED_ENABLE}"
Add filtering by tags to zabbix source
Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
Comment on lines +10 to +26
Nodes can be sourced from Zabbix API. In Zabbix, add or modify template with the Macros that you then specify in Oxidized config. Example:
source:
default: zabbix
zabbix:
url: "https://zabbix.yourdomain.com/api_jsonrpc.php"
token: "yourzabbixapitoken"
template: "Cisco IOS by SNMP"
map:
username: "{$OXIDIZED_USERNAME}"
password: "{$OXIDIZED_PASSWORD}"
model: "{$OXIDIZED_MODEL}"
vars_map:
group: "{$OXIDIZED_GROUP}"
enable: "{$OXIDIZED_ENABLE}"

- Update Zabbix source to implement filtering by tags are requested by other users.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Write details in docs/ not in the CHANGELOG.

@robertcheramy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ytti - I haven't looked in Detail in this PR. as I think you were involved in specific sources for Zabbix. Do you have an opinion on it ?

@ytti

ytti commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@ziotibia81 has not confirmed if it addresses their use-case. There seems to be some disagreement if node discovery offered satisfies both users.

I think having Zabbix support would be good, but it may be difficult to find right implementation without multiple zabbix users confirming their use-case is addressed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants