Add synchronized fleet and graph controls - #3
Merged
Conversation
wrgrant
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 20:59
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
The fleet navigator and graph were useful independently but did not yet behave like one application. Narrow graph panels also allowed the worktree rail and wrapped controls to collide.
Validation
pnpm run formatpnpm run lintpnpm run typecheckpnpm run test(90 backend, 15 extension, 43 webview)pnpm run packagewgrant-dev.git-fleet@0.2.0locallyThe VS Code integration runner compiled successfully, but the downloaded temporary test app triggered macOS Gatekeeper because the current stable bundle executable name no longer matches the test harness expectation. No assertion failure was observed.