Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency @vitest/coverage-v8 to v4.1.11 - #82

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/vitest-monorepo
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/vitest-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@vitest/coverage-v8 (source) 4.0.104.1.11 age confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (@​vitest/coverage-v8)

v4.1.11

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.10

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.9

Compare Source

🐞 Bug Fixes
  • Fix importOriginal with optimizer and query import [backport to v4] - by Hiroshi Ogawa, David Harris, Codexand Vladimir in #​10546 (a5180)
  • browser:
    • Wait for orchestrator readiness before resolving browser sessions [backport to v4] - by Vladimir and Séamus O'Connor in #​10555 (7fb29)
    • Wait for iframe tester readiness before preparing [backport to v4] - by Vladimir and Séamus O'Connor in #​10497 and #​10556 (fbc62)
  • mocker:
    • Hoist vi.mock() for vite-plus/test imports [backport to v4] - by Hiroshi Ogawa, LongYinan, Claude Opus 4.8 and Vladimir in #​10548 (2c955)
  • pool:
    • Prevent test run hang on worker crash [backport to v4] - by Ari Perkkiö and Jattioui Ismail in #​10543 and #​10564 (934b0)
View changes on GitHub

v4.1.8

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.7

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.6

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.5

Compare Source

   🚀 Experimental Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.4

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Experimental Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.2

Compare Source

This release bumps Vitest's flatted version and removes version pinning to resolve flatted's CVE related issues (#​9975).

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.1

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.1.0

Compare Source

Vitest 4.1 is out!

This release page lists all changes made to the project during the 4.1 beta. To get a review of all the new features, read our blog post.

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes

Important

✂ PR body was truncated to here.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 03164fe to d53b01c Compare September 9, 2026 17:45
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from d53b01c to 7b3e6c7 Compare September 15, 2026 15:49
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: b4fc4f59-c39e-4613-8070-533574bb0f78

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants