docs: add CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md#24
Closed
tapheret2 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md file containing a Contributor Covenant v2.1–style code of conduct, including pledge, community standards, enforcement/reporting guidance, and attribution. ChangesCode of Conduct Documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 3❌ Failed checks (3 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md`:
- Around line 18-19: The reporting section is too vague and should name a
concrete contact or channel instead of only “project maintainers.” Update the
reporting path in the Code of Conduct text to point to a specific reporting
email, form, or other designated contact, so readers know exactly where to send
incidents and complaints.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
Comment on lines
+18
to
+19
| Instances of abusive behavior may be reported to the project maintainers. | ||
| All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Make the reporting path actionable.
“Project maintainers” is too vague for an enforceable policy. Please name a concrete reporting channel or contact so contributors know where to send incidents.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md` around lines 18 - 19, The reporting section is too vague
and should name a concrete contact or channel instead of only “project
maintainers.” Update the reporting path in the Code of Conduct text to point to
a specific reporting email, form, or other designated contact, so readers know
exactly where to send incidents and complaints.
Author
|
Closing to reduce open-PR noise and focus on higher-signal contributions. Happy to reopen with a tighter, issue-linked change if maintainers still want this. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Addresses good-first-issue #2: Changelog generator skill
Changes
Closes #2
Summary by CodeRabbit