fix: harden resume generation and anonymize public examples - #1
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Arete's existing tests passed while missing executable Markdown front matter, shell-interpolated compiler paths, destructive template initialization, and incorrect PDF page validation. This change repairs those boundaries, preserves candidate facts during parsing, and verifies real resume PDFs in CI.
docs/RESUME_AUDIT.md. The general format aligns with published recruiting guidance; no claim is made that any employer uses or endorses this exact template. Anonymization covers repository content, not automatic anonymous exports or Git history.Validation: frozen installation, formatting, lint, typecheck, 50 tests, coverage (96.38% lines; 85.65% branches), build, CLI validation, and full dependency audit passed. Lint retains two existing parser/renderer complexity warnings. Actual concurrent English/Portuguese one-page A4 PDFs pass Poppler extraction checks; real oversized content is rejected. The English PDF was visually reviewed at 10pt. System TeX fallback boundaries are fixture-tested; the actual local PDF smoke uses bundled Tectonic.