-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Feat: add request.extensions["retry"] #75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
will-ockmore
merged 6 commits into
will-ockmore:main
from
vgavro:feat/request-extensions
May 25, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fd02325
feat: add request.extensions["retry"] for retry configuration per req…
vgavro f5896cb
feat: add Retry.copy_with method for more easier usage with request.e…
vgavro c4433b2
fix: update request.extensions["retry"] on increment
vgavro 29e6860
feat: do not mutate request.extensions["retry"] on retry, set respons…
vgavro d58a8b3
added copy_with tests to match __init__ signature
vgavro 41e6288
Merge branch 'main' into feat/request-extensions
vgavro File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As we're using the sentinel pattern here, the more performant check is
x is _UNSETinstead ofisinstance(x, _UnsetType)Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's totally for type-checkers on using Sentinel, it's either - we'll do as typechekers wants us to do with
_UnsetType = _UNSETpattern and usingisinstance()(because, formally, you can pass OTHER _UnsetType, not only _UNSET sentinel), or adding mypy/pyright/ty ignores there.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you prefer typing ignores for performance - i'll fix, let me know.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a fair argument. I haven't measured the performance impact, I doubt it is worth changing.