Skip to content

Async thrust #298

Description

@gmerlo

This is not really an issue but more a question. Do you @germasch and @bd4 think it makes sense to support also the thrust ansyc api in addition to what is now supported or you don't see the need/is too complicated? I believe now even if one executes a reduction on a async stream, thrust still syncs

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions