Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.keycloak:keycloak-services from 26.4.0 to 26.5.2#977

Open
vzakharchenko wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-59be6f9e45323ec59250af97bea024ac
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.keycloak:keycloak-services from 26.4.0 to 26.5.2#977
vzakharchenko wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-59be6f9e45323ec59250af97bea024ac

Conversation

@vzakharchenko
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • keycloak-plugins/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
high severity Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow
SNYK-JAVA-ORGKEYCLOAK-15046694
  711   org.keycloak:keycloak-services:
26.4.0 -> 26.5.2
No Known Exploit
medium severity CRLF Injection
SNYK-JAVA-IONETTY-14423947
  666   org.keycloak:keycloak-services:
26.4.0 -> 26.5.2
Proof of Concept

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 CRLF Injection
🦉 Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2416

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 95.851%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2364: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2073
Relevant Lines: 2109

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants