Skip to content

✨🧑‍💻 - MITM Proxy #3

Description

@efraespada

Is there an existing issue or feature request for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues and feature requests.

What area does this improvement affect?

Quota data / API

Which parts of Cursor Quota does this affect?

No response

Description of the idea or improvement

Run a time-boxed investigation using a local MITM HTTPS proxy to capture and decode traffic between Cursor IDE and Cursor backends (api2.cursor.sh, agent*.api5.cursor.sh, and related cursor.com dashboard APIs). The goal is to understand what the client sends and receives on the wire—especially around usage, billing, and agent/composer streams—and whether any fields (e.g. request_id, usage_uuid, token counts) can be correlated with data we already read from state.vscdb or from get-filtered-usage-events.

Current limitations or challenges

Certificate

Expected impact

Full understanding of the Cursor client with the server

Alternatives considered

No response

Cursor Quota Version

No response

Additional context or comments

No response

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

100%Progress: 100%branchedLabel to trigger branch management actionsenhancementNew feature or requestfeatureLabel to manage feature branchespriority: lowLabel to indicate a priority lowsize: XXLLabel to indicate a task of size XXL

Projects

  • Status
    In Progress

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions