Streamline operator summaries and PR validation UX

[efraespada]

Routine action results now produce compact, safer Job Summaries, while failures retain actionable category-based guidance without exposing internal narration or arbitrary provider text. AI-generated pull request descriptions can also omit validation when no verified evidence is available.

What changed

• Aggregated succeeded, failed, and skipped result counts and distinguished intentionally skipped runs from successful runs.
• Limited detailed Job Summary output to failures, using localized recovery guidance with stable error codes, retryability, and correlation references.
• Removed internal result identifiers, step narration, and arbitrary failure text from generic summaries.
• Made pull request validation optional and omitted the validation section when verified evidence is unavailable, with paired null-field validation.
• Updated English and Spanish message catalogs, documentation, generated bundles, and regression coverage for the new behavior.

Validation

• pnpm exec jest --coverage --silent --coverageReporters=json-summary — 438 suites and 3,992 tests passed on 91ff6d6.
• Coverage budgets, typecheck, lint, specification validation, documentation contracts, workflow contracts, build synchronization, npm package validation, and package smoke tests passed.
• CI Check, Copilot - Pull Request, Copilot / Review, Copilot - Commit, Copilot - Branch Sync, and RepoWise code health passed on the exact head.
• Codecov reports all modified and coverable lines covered.

Review notes

• The pull request description response contract now permits validationHeading and validation to be null, but requires both fields to be null together when evidence is unavailable.

[docs-page]

To preview the documentation for this pull request, visit the following URL:

docs.page/vypdev/copilot~381

Documentation is deployed and generated using docs.page

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.75%. Comparing base (274db40) to head (91ff6d6).
⚠️ Report is 752 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #381      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    90.94%   92.75%   +1.80%     
===========================================
  Files          135      650     +515     
  Lines         6251    16976   +10725     
  Branches      1338     4346    +3008     
===========================================
+ Hits          5685    15746   +10061     
- Misses         172      483     +311     
- Partials       394      747     +353     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ication/policies/action_summary_message_catalog.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/application/policies/action_summary_policy.ts	96.42% <100.00%> (ø)
src/application/policies/agent_response_schemas.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...olicies/pull_request_description_content_policy.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/prompts/update_pull_request_description.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 707 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[vypbot]

Bugbot: review complete

Current status: No active findings on 91ff6d6.

Pull request · Verified commit · Workflow run