Skip to content

SPIRV-LLVM-Translator{19,21,22}: fix update file#61153

Merged
classabbyamp merged 3 commits into
void-linux:masterfrom
Rutpiv:SPIRV-LLVM-Translator
Jun 21, 2026
Merged

SPIRV-LLVM-Translator{19,21,22}: fix update file#61153
classabbyamp merged 3 commits into
void-linux:masterfrom
Rutpiv:SPIRV-LLVM-Translator

Conversation

@Rutpiv

@Rutpiv Rutpiv commented Jun 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: YES

SPIRV-LLVM-Translator{19,21,22} had their update files broken by #60025
(info/refs migration); this migrates all three to the refs/tags pattern so
update-check reports them again.

No version bump here, on purpose: recent releases pull in the
SPV_INTEL_predicated_io extension, whose opcodes only exist in SPIRV-Headers
master, not in any released tag (including 1.4.350.1 from #61152). Building
against them fails until a SPIRV-Headers release ships those symbols, so the
templates stay pinned for now.

update-check will start flagging these once tracking is back. They should be
held, not bumped, until SPIRV-Headers catches up.

Comment thread srcpkgs/SPIRV-LLVM-Translator19/update Outdated
@@ -1 +1 @@
pattern="/v\K19\.[0-9.]+(?=\.tar\.gz)"
pattern="refs/tags/v\K19\.[0-9.]+"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
pattern="refs/tags/v\K19\.[0-9.]+"
pattern="refs/tags/v\K19\.[0-9.]+($|(?=^))"

and same for the others

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applied to all update files in this PR.

@Rutpiv Rutpiv force-pushed the SPIRV-LLVM-Translator branch from 3e06f3f to eb9d93b Compare June 21, 2026 01:35
@classabbyamp classabbyamp merged commit 0c91120 into void-linux:master Jun 21, 2026
8 checks passed
@Rutpiv Rutpiv deleted the SPIRV-LLVM-Translator branch June 21, 2026 01:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants