Skip to content

Update valitydev/java-workflow action to v4#61

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/valitydev-java-workflow-4.x
Open

Update valitydev/java-workflow action to v4#61
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/valitydev-java-workflow-4.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 12, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
valitydev/java-workflow action major v3v4

Release Notes

valitydev/java-workflow (valitydev/java-workflow)

v4

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

jobs:
build:
uses: valitydev/java-workflow/.github/workflows/maven-service-build.yml@v3
uses: valitydev/java-workflow/.github/workflows/maven-service-build.yml@v4

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {}

Copilot Autofix

AI 19 days ago

In general, the fix is to explicitly specify a minimal permissions block so that the GITHUB_TOKEN used by this workflow is restricted according to the principle of least privilege. This can be done at the workflow root (applies to all jobs) or per job. Since this workflow contains only a single job, adding permissions at the root is the simplest and most self‑documenting fix.

The best way to fix this specific file without changing existing functionality is to add a permissions block near the top of the workflow, alongside name: and on:. Because we don’t see any direct token usage in this file (the logic lives in the reusable workflow), a safe, minimal starting point is to grant read access to repository contents only, which matches GitHub’s recommended baseline: permissions: { contents: read }. If the reusable workflow requires additional scopes (e.g., to write to PRs), they can be added later, but starting with contents: read satisfies CodeQL’s requirement and enforces least privilege by default.

Concretely, in .github/workflows/build.yml, insert:

permissions:
  contents: read

between name: Maven Build Artifact and the on: block (lines 1–3). No imports or additional methods are needed, since this is purely a YAML configuration change.

Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/build.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/build.yml b/.github/workflows/build.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/build.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/build.yml
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 name: Maven Build Artifact
 
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
 on:
   pull_request:
     branches:
EOF
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
name: Maven Build Artifact

permissions:
contents: read

on:
pull_request:
branches:
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants