Repository navigation
Record that the queue-oct24a hold on #5427 names the modular head - #92
Draft
unpaidmoon wants to merge 7 commits into
Draft
unpaidmoon wants to merge 7 commits into
unpaidmoon wants to merge 7 commits into
Conversation
…negative result, no new kappa) Adds research/zqy-observation-not-retained, answering CrocSwap#5415 open question 1, CrocSwap#5419 experiment 1 and CrocSwap#5425 open question 1 in the formal free-word grammar: no full-frame version of the PR5402 provider word or the CrocSwap#4610 word (both orientations) contains pure y content, and b = Z Q Y is outside the free span of all caller versions at every one of the 18 backward FULL returns, also with the whole caller history. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…wap#5420) Canonical main still names make frontier4610-verify while the selected record requires frontier5413-verify, so the shared onboarding test fails before any package replay. This reuses byte-for-byte the docs/ci-verification.md repair of CrocSwap#5420 (head baa8fbb, Clear1nsight); no scientific file changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…euse census) For every paid climb/centre of the PR5402 provider word and the CrocSwap#4610 word (both orientations), the result is not in the span of earlier versions in its target frame, neither before the climb nor before the next touch of the field; no thin query, IDLE or LOCAL Y output of the p16 caller is a free combination of earlier versions. Injected-copy and repeated-query controls. Answers the global occurrence-ledger question of CrocSwap#5423 on the frozen words. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Review of CrocSwap#5427: non-membership modulo p only excludes p-integral coefficients. The span engine now keeps exact Fraction echelon forms, so all ranks, intersections and non-memberships (both parts) are over Q. Every recorded number is unchanged, including the optional depth-2 run (closure rank 56405, 0 of 18). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The overlap receipt pins verify.py and PROOF.md at the reviewed head 389578f and the repair commit dacc35b. Those commits are reachable through this merge so the pins resolve in a clone of this branch. The tree stays on upstream main 32890bc. Co-authored-by: unpaidmoon <unpaidmoon@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change and mathematical scope
Audit of one existing intake receipt. No new κ, no selected-frontier change, and no closure.
On canonical main
32890bc5de034ab8fc93ac88ead7279a6a416d04, the queue-oct24a snapshot's fourwaiting_revisionrows are still open and unretained:55de56abdfd9cd7fb83758241793c18b9ae9ce710e0df631da41a1f9ed3489e8df532189c2643cbf389578f2d3ef075495ce76f08100ac50e18f7d406532b45ce9f3259d7408594ec480a140ec81e0e2CrocSwap#5427's ledger text is still Clear1nsight's Part 1 qualification of that modular head (
A=[p],b=1), with Part 2 not independently accepted.The live CrocSwap#5427 head observed on 2026-10-25 is
e0192de5d97e5ac09f42d26d9ceedee6377c77e2. Its parents are the exact-Q repairdacc35b1f35c2b4bc2e3910520ba5cf46a020bed(child of389578f2) and this base. The repair is not contained in the base. The false sentence that non-membership modulo2^61-1implies non-membership over Q is gone there, and the repairedSpanreports that1lies in the rational span ofp. The other three recorded heads still matched GitHub on that observation.One replay of Matarener's checker at
e0192de5on CPython 3.12.3 exited 0 withPASS_ZQY_OBSERVATION_NOT_RETAINED. That is an author-checker replay, not acceptance of Part 2 and not a reason to merge CrocSwap#5427.An ours-merge makes
389578f2anddacc35b1freachable so the source pins resolve. It does not take the ZQY tree.Task and overlap
Task
overlap-receipt, scope refined to this one receipt. Base32890bc5de034ab8fc93ac88ead7279a6a416d04. Eligible-list item 19 of the revision-7 catalogue order.Nearest work is the maintained queue-oct24a receipt and Clear1nsight's review of
389578f2. This package records that the hold does not namedacc35b1f. No other receipt package for that head change was found.Validation
Both passed here (
PASS_PR5427_HOLD_HEAD_RECEIPT,PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE). The checker does not contact GitHub and does not rerun the ZQY census. The separate author replay above was not registered inVERIFY.json.--left-depth 2and the optimised command were not run.Credit
Queue-oct24a and the ledger rows are the maintained record. Chris R / Clear1nsight wrote the Part 1 qualification. Mark / Matarener wrote the ZQY package and the exact-Q repair. The package scaffold is Douglas Colkitt's.
Prepared by unpaidmoon with substantial Cursor Grok assistance. Apache-2.0.
Open next questions
Re-read CrocSwap#5427 at
e0192de5before any closure. The modular sentence no longer matches that head. Part 2 remains outside the earlier review. This receipt does not perform that reading.Workflow feedback (optional)
Fork
mainis behind canonical main, so this draft is based on a pin of32890bc5rather than the fork'smain.