Repository navigation
feat: migrate unbuild to tsdown - #712
Conversation
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. 🧰 Additional context used📚 Code guidelines (2)No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 2 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe package build changes from unbuild to tsdown. Package entry points and build outputs use ESM and CommonJS extensions. Metro and Vite adapter paths and tests are updated for those outputs. ChangesBuild and bundler migration
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Change: Refactor Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to No actionable migration defect is established; the change is mergeable after normal build and test checks. Security Architecture ReviewSecurity architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The migration preserves public entrypoint names and existing initialization authority. No introduced security vulnerability was established. Risk remains low rather than minimal because published outputs and some format-specific initialization behavior could not be verified. Retained concerns Security review detailsSecurity Blast Radius
Trust Boundaries and Controls
Resilience and Maintainability Implications
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Summary by CodeRabbit