Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
src/components/ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AIWorkflowCard.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/components/ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AIWorkflowCard.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/components/ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/AiReviewTab.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/components/ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/AiReviewTab.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/components/AiWorkflowsTableListing.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/components/AiWorkflowsTableListing.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...llengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/components/ConfigurationSourceSelector.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...llengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/components/ConfigurationSourceSelector.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nents/ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/components/ManualWorkflowCard.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nents/ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/components/ManualWorkflowCard.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nents/ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/components/ManualWorkflowCard.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ts/ChallengeEditor/ChallengeReviewer-Field/AiReviewerTab/components/ReviewSettingsSection.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| <div className={styles.summaryCard}> | ||
| <h4>Workflows</h4> | ||
| <div className={styles.summaryValue}> | ||
| {configuration.workflows.length} total |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
Consider handling the case where configuration.workflows might be undefined or null to prevent potential runtime errors. You could use optional chaining or a default value.
| {configuration.workflows.length} total | ||
| {configuration.workflows.some(w => w.isGating) && ( | ||
| <div className={styles.summarySubtext}> | ||
| {configuration.workflows.filter(w => w.isGating).length} gating |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[💡 performance]
The use of filter here could be optimized by using reduce to count the gating workflows in a single pass, which might improve performance slightly if the list is large.
| const WeightValidationCard = ({ workflows }) => { | ||
| const scoringWorkflows = workflows.filter(workflow => !workflow.isGating) | ||
| const gatingWorkflows = workflows.filter(workflow => workflow.isGating) | ||
| const weightsTotal = workflows.reduce((sum, workflow) => sum + (Number(workflow.weightPercent) || 0), 0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
Consider using parseFloat instead of Number for parsing weightPercent to ensure that decimal values are correctly handled. Number can sometimes lead to unexpected results with non-numeric strings.
| const scoringWorkflows = workflows.filter(workflow => !workflow.isGating) | ||
| const gatingWorkflows = workflows.filter(workflow => workflow.isGating) | ||
| const weightsTotal = workflows.reduce((sum, workflow) => sum + (Number(workflow.weightPercent) || 0), 0) | ||
| const isWeightValid = Math.abs(weightsTotal - 100) < 0.01 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
The weight validation logic using Math.abs(weightsTotal - 100) < 0.01 might lead to unexpected results due to floating-point precision issues. Consider using a more robust method to handle floating-point comparisons.
| const gatingWorkflows = workflows.filter(workflow => workflow.isGating) | ||
| const weightsTotal = workflows.reduce((sum, workflow) => sum + (Number(workflow.weightPercent) || 0), 0) | ||
| const isWeightValid = Math.abs(weightsTotal - 100) < 0.01 | ||
| const remainingWeight = Math.round((100 - weightsTotal) * 100) / 100 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[💡 correctness]
Rounding remainingWeight using Math.round might not be necessary if the intention is to maintain precision for display purposes. Consider whether this rounding is required or if it could lead to misleading information.
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (err) { | ||
| console.error('Error loading AI review configuration:', err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
Consider handling the error more gracefully by providing user feedback or retrying the operation. Currently, the error is only logged to the console, which may not be sufficient for user-facing applications.
| lastSavedConfigRef.current = savedConfig | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error('Error autosaving AI review configuration:', error) | ||
| toastFailure(`⚠️ Autosave error: ${error.message}`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[❗❗ security]
The error message displayed to the user includes the raw error message, which might expose sensitive information. Consider providing a more user-friendly error message.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| loadAIReviewConfig() | ||
| }, [challengeId, updateConfiguration]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[💡 performance]
The updateConfiguration function is included in the dependency array of the useEffect, but it is not used within the effect. This could lead to unnecessary re-renders. Consider removing it from the dependency array.
| setTemplates(fetchedTemplates || []) | ||
| setTemplatesLoading(false) | ||
| } catch (err) { | ||
| console.error('Error loading templates:', err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
Consider using a more descriptive error message or including the error details in the setError call to provide more context to the user or developer when debugging.
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | |||
| export const isAIReviewer = (reviewer) => { | |||
| return reviewer && ( | |||
| (reviewer.aiWorkflowId && reviewer.aiWorkflowId.trim() !== '') || | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
Consider using String.prototype.trim() only after verifying that reviewer.aiWorkflowId is a string to avoid potential runtime errors if aiWorkflowId is not a string.
| (reviewer.aiWorkflowId && reviewer.aiWorkflowId.trim() !== '') || | ||
| (reviewer.isMemberReview === false) | ||
| ) | ||
| } No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[💡 style]
Add a newline at the end of the file to adhere to POSIX standards and improve compatibility with various tools.
| aiReviewers, | ||
| }) => { | ||
| const { workflows = [] } = metadata | ||
| const assignedWorkflows = useMemo(() => aiReviewers.map(reviewer => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[💡 performance]
Using useMemo here might not be necessary unless aiReviewers or workflows are large arrays or the computation is expensive. Consider removing it if performance is not a concern, as it adds complexity.
| <div className={styles.workflowsList}> | ||
| {assignedWorkflows.map((item, index) => ( | ||
| <AIWorkflowCard | ||
| key={`workflow-${index}`} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
Using the index as a key in a list can lead to issues if the list is reordered or modified. Consider using a unique identifier from the item object, such as item.reviewer.aiWorkflowId, if available.
| <AIWorkflowCard | ||
| key={`workflow-${index}`} | ||
| workflow={item.workflow || { name: item.reviewer.aiWorkflowId }} | ||
| scorecardId={(item.workflow || item.reviewer).scorecardId} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
Accessing scorecardId from (item.workflow || item.reviewer) assumes that one of these objects will always have a scorecardId. Ensure that this assumption holds true in all cases to avoid potential runtime errors.
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| if (error.response && error.response.status === 404) { | ||
| return null | ||
| } | ||
| console.error(`Error fetching AI review config for challenge %s:`, challengeId, error.message) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[❗❗ correctness]
The use of %s in the console.error statement is incorrect for JavaScript. JavaScript's console.error does not support format specifiers like %s. Instead, you can pass multiple arguments to console.error, which will be concatenated with spaces. Consider removing %s and directly passing challengeId and error.message as separate arguments.
2 participants
https://topcoder.atlassian.net/browse/PM-3851 - Work Manager UI — AI Review Configuration
Note: we need to add TC_REVIEWS_API_BASE_URL to env (just needs to point to "https://api.topocoder-dev.com/v6"