docs: record out-of-scope decisions - #59
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds 13 records to
.out-of-scope/, next tokey-folding.mdandinline-annotations.md. Each file covers one rejected format concept: what is out, why (with § references and the original ruling quoted), and every issue, PR, or discussion that asked for it. New requests can be matched against them during triage instead of re-arguing them.encoder-data-rewrites.mdalso covers key abbreviation requested in toon-format/toon-python, since dropping, filling, or renaming keys breaks the same §2 guarantee in every implementation.The close comments for #48, #47, discussions #10 and #41, toon-format/toon#344, and toon-format/toon-python#25 link to
blob/main/.out-of-scope/…, so this needs to merge before those comments are posted.