Skip to content

chore(docs): standardize package quality and renderer - #20

Merged
kaimacann merged 4 commits into
developmentfrom
automation/codex/docs-hygiene-20261112
Nov 12, 2026
Merged

kaimacann merged 4 commits into
developmentfrom
automation/codex/docs-hygiene-20261112

Conversation

@kaimacann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Push the current repository snapshot for review.

Validation

  • Focused ESLint and git diff --check passed.

…into development

# Conflicts:
#	site/src/lib/catalog.ts
#	src/components/StaticWorkspace.tsx
#	src/components/navigation.tsx
Fix CommonJS ESLint globals and apply the reviewed repository updates. Validation: focused ESLint and git diff --check passed.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-12T00:37:19.109225Z a7dc2dd PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-12T00:30:25.031942Z a7dc2dd PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a7dc2dda3a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread config/vite.config.ts
@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
/**

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Remove the stale demo-build job

The demo-build job in .github/workflows/check.yml still runs pnpm exec vite build --config config/vite.config.ts, but this commit deletes that configuration along with the demo sources. On every push and pull request, Vite will fail to load the specified config, causing the workflow to fail before the other checks can complete; remove the obsolete job or point it at an existing build.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

: undefined;
const sourceCssPlugins = sourceDevelopment
? [
requireFromPackage('postcss-import')(),

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Restore the direct postcss-import dependency

When the documented pnpm dev command runs from this repository, bin/docs.mjs sets DOCS_SOURCE_DEV=true, so Astro evaluates this call during config loading. This commit simultaneously removes postcss-import from package.json; after a clean pnpm install it exists only inside Tailwind's isolated dependency tree and cannot be resolved by requireFromPackage, so the development server exits with a module-resolution error before starting. Keep it as a direct dev dependency or avoid requiring it here.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +2009 to +2010
const { data, error: err } = await actions.read.doc.attachments({ paths });
if (err || !data || Array.isArray(data)) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve single-path attachment reads for existing hosts

When an existing DocsHostAdapter is upgraded, its read.doc.attachments implementation may still support the previously used { path } request and return an attachment array. This dialog now unconditionally sends { paths } and explicitly discards array responses, so those hosts show no attachments in the page/group management dialog even though individual attachment reads still work elsewhere. Retain the per-path calls as a fallback, or introduce the batch operation without removing compatibility with the existing contract.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@kaimacann
kaimacann merged commit b54ed67 into development Nov 12, 2026
1 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant