Repository navigation
Conversation
enaboapps
force-pushed
the
885-tabs-options
branch
from
September 25, 2026 10:56
7be8214 to
338f293
Compare
enaboapps
force-pushed
the
886-forms
branch
from
September 25, 2026 10:56
43a3ebd to
1e11013
Compare
enaboapps
force-pushed
the
885-tabs-options
branch
from
September 25, 2026 11:03
338f293 to
054f9e2
Compare
enaboapps
force-pushed
the
886-forms
branch
from
September 25, 2026 11:03
1e11013 to
082ec0a
Compare
enaboapps
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 25, 2026 11:49
The first setting group under a header or tab row drops its extra divider. The auto scan rate becomes one stepper control, colour choices become chips that show the selection with a border and fill, and teaching disclosures read as a plain title with a brand action. Scanning mode cards sit side by side with a chevron and a status chip for the mode Select starts, How scanning works becomes a proper disclosure card, and the bottom note no longer repeats the save status shown above. Closes #886 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Colour chips inside a disabled group no longer show a pointer or hover, and the scan rate stepper dims its frame and value when both steps are unavailable, instead of only greying the minus and plus. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
enaboapps
force-pushed
the
885-tabs-options
branch
from
September 25, 2026 11:50
054f9e2 to
61f8f64
Compare
enaboapps
force-pushed
the
886-forms
branch
from
September 25, 2026 11:50
082ec0a to
19db7ff
Compare
enaboapps
marked this pull request as draft
September 25, 2026 11:50
enaboapps
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 25, 2026 14:21
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #886. Stacked on #895, tracked in #891.
What changed
:has().Validation
On this head:
npm run lintpassednpm testpassed: 238 Vitest tests and 5 Node testsnpm run buildpassedcargo fmt --check,cargo clippy --all-targets -D warningsandcargo testpassed (566 tests, 1 ignored). No Rust changes in this stack.Review follow-up
An independent review of this layer's head raised these points, now addressed:
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Rebase validation (2026-09-25)
Rebased onto current
main(7fb8fce, including #881) in stack order.git range-diffshows every commit in this PR is patch-equivalent to its previous head, and the intended parent remains its PR base. On the final stack tip (40c75cc), Node 24.19.0 lint, tests and build passed; Rust 1.97.1 format check, Clippy and tests passed. An independent review of the updated PR heads found no actionable findings. CI is rerunning on each new head.