Skip to content

Update mantine monorepo to v8.3.15#847

Merged
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/mantine-monorepo
Feb 16, 2026
Merged

Update mantine monorepo to v8.3.15#847
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/mantine-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 16, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@mantine/core (source) 8.3.148.3.15 age confidence
@mantine/hooks (source) 8.3.148.3.15 age confidence

Release Notes

mantinedev/mantine (@​mantine/core)

v8.3.15

Compare Source

mantinedev/mantine (@​mantine/hooks)

v8.3.15

Compare Source

What's Changed
  • [@mantine/dropzone] Update react-dropzone to 15.0.0 (#​8667)
  • [@mantine/core]TagsInput: Fix duplicate checking bypass with splitChars (#​8686)
  • [@mantine/charts] Allow ChartTooltip valueFormatter to return React.ReactNode (#​8650)
  • [@mantine/dates] DatePicker: Fix placeholder selector missing in Styles API (#​8663)
  • [@mantine/core] Add missing factory types exports (#​8677)
  • [@mantine/core] Fix inert attribute being ignored by Checkbox and Switch components (#​8668)

Full Changelog: mantinedev/mantine@8.3.14...8.3.15


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot merged commit 1c806d7 into main Feb 16, 2026
2 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/mantine-monorepo branch February 16, 2026 14:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants

Comments