chore: name the maintainer in gitlab-mcp-db and reword the fork label

[polaz]

@structured-world/gitlab-mcp-db had no author field, unlike the main package; it now names the maintainer. The fork-only review label in .coderabbit.yaml still described the fork by a name the project no longer uses.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated labeling guidance to clarify that the fork-only label applies specifically to this fork.
  • Added package author information to the GitLab MCP database package metadata.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: e23ee45a-da94-4767-88e6-118d40b50095

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a408d3e and 7d75df0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .coderabbit.yaml
• packages/gitlab-mcp-db/package.json

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update the fork-only label instruction and add an author field to the gitlab-mcp-db package manifest.

Changes

Repository metadata

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update repository metadata .coderabbit.yaml, packages/gitlab-mcp-db/package.json	The fork-only instruction now identifies the label as specific to the fork. The package manifest now includes the author name and email.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 7d75d

This updates package attribution and clarifies fork-specific label guidance without changing runtime behavior. No current merge-readiness risk remains.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes both changes: naming the maintainer in gitlab-mcp-db and rewording the fork-only label.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/package-author

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-05T17:29:42.990912Z	7d75df0	New commits

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud