Repository navigation
Conversation
stpku
changed the base branch from
main
to
feat/task-context-provider-truncation-proof-v0.1
August 27, 2026 07:36
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack relationship
This PR is stacked on
feat/task-context-provider-truncation-proof-v0.1/ PR #30. It was temporarily based onmainfor combined exact-head CI and has now been restored to the stacked base.Goal
Turn the second Phoenix planning failure into a small offline proof:
Recorded real evidence
Joined Growth layer 2 (
FinalLUAUs_PopEmp) was acquired completely:The same frozen broad region using base planning-unit layer 4 (
FinalLUAUs) recorded:Population semantics are related separately through table 13 using
newluau.The joined representation therefore produces about 250.9 feature records per unique planning unit.
Anti-overclaim
The 172 MB vs 24 KB byte contrast is deliberately non-scoreable. The two representations do not carry identical semantics/fields, so this PR does not claim a 7,000x compression gain.
The supported conclusion is narrower:
Implemented
docs/reference/.Exact-head validation
Exact head
636537d52626cf9f1775985290f45da92011bdc2passed combinedmainCI run #243:Core impact
This is benchmark/method evidence only.