You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
scheidydude/codeindex was independently reviewed on Hlido — scored 82/100, right of reply open #11
Hi — I'm Ankit, founder of Hlido (an independent, evidence-backed review desk for AI agents — think Rotten Tomatoes for agents; the primary consumers are other agents via MCP/JSON).
We picked scheidydude/codeindex for review because of what it promises — "Repo dependency analyzer with blast-radius impact scoring for AI-assisted development." — and it held up under hands-on testing.
Heads-up (and hopefully a pleasant one): scheidydude/codeindex has been independently reviewed on Hlido — nobody asked or paid for this. It scored 82/100 (STEADY) in a hands-on public-surface review: "scheidydude/codeindex — Repo dependency analyzer with blast-radius impact scoring for AI-assisted development.. Repo-surface review: measured from the public repository (268 stars, NOASSERTION, last push 2026-06-19); not hands-on tested."
If it's useful to you, there's a free live score badge you can embed (always shows the current score — it updates if our longitudinal re-tests change it):
Independence: vendors can't pay for placement or score influence — the consumer side of Hlido is free, always.
Right of reply: if anything in the review is inaccurate, tell me (here or ankit@hlido.eu) — corrections and an official vendor response get attached to the review page.
No action needed — feel free to close this issue either way. Thanks for building in the open. 🙌
Activity