Link the SBOM examples page to the formats comparison - #130
Merged
vpetersson merged 1 commit intoAug 5, 2026
Conversation
The examples page stops at the naming differences between CycloneDX and SPDX, which is as far as an examples page should go. The 2,210-word comparison already covers governance, license depth, native vulnerability support and which frameworks expect which, so point at it rather than restating any of it. Also consolidates rather than competes: 'sbom formats' and 'sbom standard' are 530/mo combined at KD 4-8, and that post is the page that should hold them. Adding a second page on the same topic would have split the two.
vpetersson
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Small follow-up to #129.
/sbom-examples/stops at the naming differences between CycloneDX and SPDX, which is as far as an examples page should go. The existing formats comparison already covers governance, license depth, native vulnerability support and framework preferences in 2,210 words, so this points at it rather than restating any of it.Deliberately not a new
/sbom-formats/page. That post is the page that should hold the formats topic — a second page on the same ground would have split it.Build and lint pass; no other content changes.