Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix timing attack in token authentication#282

Open
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel/fix-auth-timing-attack-8549029983029992682
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix timing attack in token authentication#282
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel/fix-auth-timing-attack-8549029983029992682

Conversation

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Severity: HIGH
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: Fast-path short-circuiting in token validation using buffer length comparisons before calling crypto.timingSafeEqual introduced a timing attack vulnerability, leaking the length of the secret token.
🎯 Impact: Attackers could deduce the length of the authentication token, significantly reducing the complexity of brute-force attacks.
πŸ”§ Fix: Modified the authentication logic to hash both the expected and provided tokens to a fixed length (using SHA-256) before performing the constant-time comparison, eliminating the length check.
βœ… Verification: Ensure the test suite passes and that authentication logic does not short-circuit based on input length.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 8549029983029992682 started by @YoungSx

The previous implementation of token authentication in `src/cli/commands/serve.ts` short-circuited constant-time comparison if the lengths of the provided token and expected token did not match. This allowed attackers to infer the length of a token via a timing side channel. This fix hashes both the provided and expected tokens to a fixed length using SHA-256 prior to calling `crypto.timingSafeEqual`, ensuring a true constant-time comparison.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants