Look for the cdb architecture that corresponds to the target triple#159060
Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intoJul 11, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
instead of the build triple Debugging other architectures with the build target CDB is neither a common nor a good user experience - for example, when targeting i686 from a x86_64 build target, you get all the internal WOW64 events, which also break debuginfo tests. Use the cdb.exe that corresponds to the target's architecture instead.
17524d2 to
83f5101
Compare
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2026
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Contributor
JonathanBrouwer
added a commit
to JonathanBrouwer/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2026
…target, r=jieyouxu Look for the cdb architecture that corresponds to the target triple instead of the build triple Debugging other architectures with the build target CDB is neither a common nor a good user experience - for example, when targeting i686 from a x86_64 build target, you get all the internal WOW64 events, which also break debuginfo tests. (See rust-lang#159032) Use the cdb.exe that corresponds to the target's architecture instead.
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #159126 (Fix PR number in bootstrap's change tracker) - #156968 (diagnostics: suggest generic_const_args for const ops) - #159012 (Shrink mir::Statement to 40 bytes) - #158182 (std: use `OnceLock` for SGX argument storage) - #159114 (Add regression test for $-prefixed fragment specifier in repetition) - #159060 (Look for the cdb architecture that corresponds to the target triple) - #159089 (riscv: update c-variadic test for LLVM changes) - #159093 (pretty-print: use inline asm's actual macro name)
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #159126 (Fix PR number in bootstrap's change tracker) - #156968 (diagnostics: suggest generic_const_args for const ops) - #159012 (Shrink mir::Statement to 40 bytes) - #158182 (std: use `OnceLock` for SGX argument storage) - #159114 (Add regression test for $-prefixed fragment specifier in repetition) - #159060 (Look for the cdb architecture that corresponds to the target triple) - #159089 (riscv: update c-variadic test for LLVM changes) - #159093 (pretty-print: use inline asm's actual macro name)
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #159126 (Fix PR number in bootstrap's change tracker) - #155811 (Include AtomicU128/AtomicI128 in docs for any target) - #156968 (diagnostics: suggest generic_const_args for const ops) - #159012 (Shrink mir::Statement to 40 bytes) - #156618 (rustdoc: test ignoring rustc lints in CLI) - #158182 (std: use `OnceLock` for SGX argument storage) - #159114 (Add regression test for $-prefixed fragment specifier in repetition) - #158523 (Fix feature gate for `repr(simd)`) - #158876 (Fix multiple logic bugs in `Arc::make_mut`) - #158928 (std: fix Xous UDP send_to length mismatch and truncation) - #159060 (Look for the cdb architecture that corresponds to the target triple) - #159089 (riscv: update c-variadic test for LLVM changes) - #159093 (pretty-print: use inline asm's actual macro name) - #159122 (doc: use ptr::addr in offset_from docs) Failed merges: - #158732 (Apply MCP 1003 and move diagnostics.rs into its own module)
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2026
Rollup merge of #159060 - Fulgen301:bootstrap-cdb-discovery-target, r=jieyouxu Look for the cdb architecture that corresponds to the target triple instead of the build triple Debugging other architectures with the build target CDB is neither a common nor a good user experience - for example, when targeting i686 from a x86_64 build target, you get all the internal WOW64 events, which also break debuginfo tests. (See #159032) Use the cdb.exe that corresponds to the target's architecture instead.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
instead of the build triple
Debugging other architectures with the build target CDB is neither a common nor a good user experience - for example, when targeting i686 from a x86_64 build target, you get all the internal WOW64 events, which also break debuginfo tests. (See #159032)
Use the cdb.exe that corresponds to the target's architecture instead.