Skip to content

EffectiveVisibility: split fixed-point iteration into 2 stages#156138

Draft
Bryanskiy wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Bryanskiy:eff_vis_iter_advanced
Draft

EffectiveVisibility: split fixed-point iteration into 2 stages#156138
Bryanskiy wants to merge 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Bryanskiy:eff_vis_iter_advanced

Conversation

@Bryanskiy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Use fixed-point iteration exclusively for modules and use chains during EffectiveVisibility computation. Other defs/fields are computed in a separate single pass.

r? @petrochenkov

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 4, 2026
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 4, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2026
`EffectiveVisibility`: split fixed-point iteration into 2 stages
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Bryanskiy Bryanskiy force-pushed the eff_vis_iter_advanced branch from fad9377 to d76cb84 Compare May 4, 2026 10:41
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented May 4, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 0f6b3e5 (0f6b3e5650c214776ae5f15284bf9e746cdb46d1, parent: 783062d3c612d223e6841db4bbbc9bac4ab31ff4)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0f6b3e5): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 4
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.2% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 4

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.7%, secondary 1.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.7% [1.7%, 1.7%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.1% [0.5%, 2.4%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.7% [1.7%, 1.7%] 1

Cycles

Results (primary 2.7%, secondary -1.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.7% [2.7%, 2.7%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.6% [0.4%, 0.8%] 5
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.8% [-4.1%, -0.5%] 10
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.7% [2.7%, 2.7%] 1

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 495.891s -> 494.917s (-0.20%)
Artifact size: 394.42 MiB -> 394.41 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 4, 2026
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 5, 2026
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
`EffectiveVisibility`: split fixed-point iteration into 2 stages
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 5, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented May 5, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 7ee0eba (7ee0eba7a64e803714f46cbea6525bfdde6ad833, parent: 4feb7221f4d445120a5061b16ce7222adbfdf6f6)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (7ee0eba): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, fix the regressions and do another perf run. Neutral or positive results will clear the label automatically.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.4% [0.3%, 0.6%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.6% [-0.9%, -0.2%] 20
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.1% [-0.3%, -0.1%] 10
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.6% [-0.9%, -0.2%] 20

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.1%, secondary 1.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.4% [2.9%, 6.1%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-8.1%, -0.5%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1

Cycles

Results (primary -2.1%, secondary -0.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.3% [0.7%, 2.1%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.7% [-6.0%, -0.4%] 5
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 495.518s -> 493.52s (-0.40%)
Artifact size: 394.42 MiB -> 394.41 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels May 5, 2026
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Let's block on #156185 for now.
@rustbot blocked

@rustbot rustbot added the S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. label May 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

perf-regression Performance regression. S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants