refactor: use renderable guard for suffix

[QDyanbing]

说明

• 使用 isReactRenderable 统一判断 suffix 是否需要渲染
• 支持数字 0、NaN 等有效 React 内容
• 通过 Fragment 兼容当前 @rc-component/input@1.3.1 的 suffix 判断
• 将 @rc-component/util 的最低版本提升到首次提供该 helper 的 ^1.13.0

验证

• npm run tsc
• npm test -- --runInBand
• git diff --check

关联 ant-design/ant-design#59193

Summary by CodeRabbit

• 错误修复

  • 优化 Mentions 组件后缀内容的渲染判断，确保可渲染内容及清除功能按预期显示。
  • 改善后缀传递方式，提升复杂后缀内容的兼容性。

• 依赖更新

  • 更新相关工具依赖版本，带来兼容性和稳定性改进。

[vercel]

@QDyanbing is attempting to deploy a commit to the afc163's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 9b3d8ddb-e00d-4272-ab17-2446ebd60bfa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac4e0ea and 24766b4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• package.json
• src/Mentions.tsx

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review.

---

Walkthrough

升级 @rc-component/util，并调整 Mentions 对 suffix 的可渲染性判断及传递方式。

Changes

Mentions 后缀渲染处理

Layer / File(s)	Summary
后缀可渲染性处理 package.json, src/Mentions.tsx	升级 @rc-component/util。Mentions 使用 isReactRenderable 判断 suffix，并将可渲染值包装为 Fragment 后传递给 BaseInput。

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 24766

Mentions suffix handling now consistently accepts React-renderable values such as 0 and NaN while preserving input compatibility through Fragment wrapping. The required utility dependency is updated accordingly, and no current merge-blocking risk remains.

Suggested reviewers: zombiej, afc163

Poem

小兔捧着后缀跑，
Fragment 轻轻把它抱。
util 版本向前跳，
BaseInput 收好新花帽。
清除按钮也报到。

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	标题“refactor: use renderable guard for suffix”准确概括了本次变更的主要内容，即使用 isReactRenderable 重构 suffix 的渲染判断。标题简洁、明确，并与代码变更和 PR 目标一致。
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.36%. Comparing base (ac4e0ea) to head (24766b4).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #337   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.35%   98.36%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         304      305    +1     
  Branches       82       83    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits          299      300    +1     
  Misses          5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[yoyo837]

Reviewed the renderability semantics, helper selection, dependency floor, existing feedback, and completed CI results. The implementation looks correct. The Vercel failure is limited to team deployment authorization and is not a code or build failure.