fix(qw-search): TopHits aggregations because of unsupported OwnedValue deser with postcard

[Totodore]

Description

The Tantivy OwnedValue enum used in the TopHitsVecEntry was triggering a postcard WontImplement error.

Redefine OwnedValue with support for postcard de-serialization as well as TopHits result types.

Testing

Top hits scenario is ok with quickwit and elasticsearch

(rest-api-tests) ➜  rest-api-tests git:(fix-tophits-agg-deserialization) ✗ ./run_tests.py --test scenarii/es_compatibility/0032-top_hits.yaml 
Namespace(engine='quickwit', test=['scenarii/es_compatibility/0032-top_hits.yaml'], binary=None)
Filtering tests prefixes: ['scenarii/es_compatibility/0032-top_hits.yaml']
============
============
============
🟢 scenarii/es_compatibility/_setup.quickwit.yaml: 8 steps (0 skipped)
🟢 scenarii/es_compatibility/0032-top_hits.yaml: 1 steps (0 skipped)
🟢 scenarii/es_compatibility/_teardown.quickwit.yaml: 7 steps (0 skipped)
(rest-api-tests) ➜  rest-api-tests git:(fix-tophits-agg-deserialization) ✗ ./run_tests.py --engine quickwit --test scenarii/es_compatibility/0032-top_hits.yaml
Namespace(engine='quickwit', test=['scenarii/es_compatibility/0032-top_hits.yaml'], binary=None)
Filtering tests prefixes: ['scenarii/es_compatibility/0032-top_hits.yaml']
============
============
============
🟢 scenarii/es_compatibility/_setup.quickwit.yaml: 8 steps (0 skipped)
🟢 scenarii/es_compatibility/0032-top_hits.yaml: 1 steps (0 skipped)
🟢 scenarii/es_compatibility/_teardown.quickwit.yaml: 7 steps (0 skipped)
(rest-api-tests) ➜  rest-api-tests git:(fix-tophits-agg-deserialization)

[rdettai-sk]

This looks like a reasonable fix. To make sure we won't see regressions and ensure compatibility with ES it would great add an integration test (./quickwit/rest-api-tests/scenarii/es_compatibility). You'll see in the readme there how to run those against QW and ES.

[Totodore]

@rdettai-sk I found multiple bugs while testing but it seems to be more on the tantivy side, mostly coming from here:

https://github.com/quickwit-oss/tantivy/blob/12977bc7c4cfa6e97936e8e0ecd871183bced2a4/src/aggregation/metric/top_hits.rs#L221-L242

• if one of the field in docvalue_fields doesn't exists, this function panics because the initial checks for non-globs types assumes that the field exists.
• if one of the field in docvalue_fields exists but is a dynamic fast field, the function also panics because it doesn't find the appropriate column, it seems that their is a particular naming for dynamic fields in tantivy and that our field is not cast. Because it doesn't find the field it falls into the first point and panics.

[git/checkouts/tantivy-9cf9af06161d52ce/d904630/src/aggregation/metric/top_hits.rs:226:42] name.as_str() = "_dynamic\u{1}type"
[git/checkouts/tantivy-9cf9af06161d52ce/d904630/src/aggregation/metric/top_hits.rs:226:65] field = "type"

Can we still merge this and I'll try to propose fixes on the tantivy repo?

[Totodore]

Because quickwit is prepending _dynamic. prefix to all dynamic values, we should add this prefix to dynamic docvalue_fields in the user request, so it matches the _dynamic.{field} tantivy schema. It might be the subject of another PR though.

[Totodore]

The top hits result is still not ES compatible, got the test wrong at the first place. I still have issues to make a request that is fully compatible with the quickwit response.

[rdettai-sk]

Yes, the currently returned format is not compatible with elastic, and I think that's not good.

Es returns

      "buckets": [
        {
          "key": "1maria",
          "doc_count": 1,
          "recent_events": {
            "hits": {
              "total": {
                "value": 1,
                "relation": "eq"
              },
              "max_score": null,
              "hits": [
                  ...hits objects...

But QW returns:

      "buckets": [
        {
          "key": "1maria",
          "doc_count": 1,
          "recent_events": {
            "hits": [
                  ...hits objects...
            ]

Or stated otherwise, hits in TopHitsMetricResult should be a HitsMetadata and not Vec<Hit>.

[Totodore]

@rdettai-sk I'll ensure the format is ES compatible when refactoring the TopHits aggregation in my Tantivy's PR.

[rdettai-sk]

• It is not necessarily Tantivy's concern to be compatible with ES. You could keep the current output in Tantivy and make it ES compatible in Quickwit's TopHitsMetricResult
• I would rather not merge with the es_compat tests expecting something that is not compatible with ES