Skip to content

[HUD] Show unstable-marked jobs on the reliability page - #8419

Open
georgehong wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reliability-unstable-jobs-panel
Open

[HUD] Show unstable-marked jobs on the reliability page#8419
georgehong wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
reliability-unstable-jobs-panel

Conversation

@georgehong

@georgehong georgehong commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Previously, Unstable jobs panel feels a bit narrow since it was only including jobs part of the unstable workflow. Expand the query to also include jobs marked as unstable (e.g. with the Issue workflow). This provides a flow for users to monitor cordoned jobs and improvements in reliability.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
torchci Ready Ready Preview Aug 3, 2026 9:40pm

Request Review

@meta-cla meta-cla Bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Aug 3, 2026
The 'Unstable jobs' panel only matched the dedicated 'unstable' workflow (green
scaffolding), so jobs marked unstable via 'UNSTABLE ...' issues -- which keep
running on main with an ', unstable' config marker -- were never shown. Add an
unstableOnly toggle to master_commit_red_jobs: 0 keeps the existing workflow-scoped
behavior (verified byte-identical); 1 flips the filter to show the union of the
dedicated 'unstable' workflow and any job marked unstable on main (workflow_run-
chained jobs excluded, as in normal mode). Point the panel at it with unstableOnly=1.
Reuses the shared query instead of a fork.
@georgehong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Name the two groups the panel unions and say the marker is applied at
runtime, so the subtitle doesn't read as the filed UNSTABLE issue list.
@georgehong

georgehong commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Note: there's a moderate drain effect where non-unstable history may show the same job being present in both the stable and unstable panel(s). I think it's useful to surface cordoned jobs so they may have recovery monitored in the span of a few days to week(s), but this may be subject to discussion to ensure there's no user confusion.

The alternative may require some form of matching between unstable jobs, issue open/close timing history, and revising the job history, and we would need to update the existing panels.

@georgehong
georgehong marked this pull request as ready for review August 3, 2026 23:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant