Repository navigation
State the current reasons for the Polars chunk reader factories #1271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
laughingman7743
merged 4 commits into
master
from
docs/1249-polars-chunk-reader-docstrings
Oct 18, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0174353
State the current reasons for the Polars chunk reader factories
laughingman7743 cf186d9
Name the async future and the Polars scan in the chunk reader docstring
laughingman7743 088b79e
Qualify the schema use of the Polars chunk scan
laughingman7743 df1d35b
Refer to _iter_parquet_chunks() for the use of the Parquet schema
laughingman7743 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Self-review round 2 (claims, callers): CLEAN
Base
e086eac7bb2120e434c08c2eababccd9d0167fb0, head0174353d12172a03995a4420da46a5c9d5caeb83.execute()raises their errors": the result set is constructed insideexecute()forPolarsCursorandAioPolarsCursor(in its thread), and inside the future ofAsyncPolarsCursor.execute(), whoseresult()raises them. In all three the errors surface before the first fetch, which is the distinction Decide whether the Polars chunk readers keep the state they take at creation #1249 is about._iter_parquet_chunks()now takes no state arguments,pyathena/pandas/result_set.py:1564); merging the CSV pair would move_is_csv_readable()into the generator body and so to the first fetch.connectionparameter is still passed by the readers; this PR keeps that structure as option 1 decided.