fix broken seealso docstring entries#946
Conversation
|
If it works, I prefer bare function names when the function is in the same module, but what do you think? |
|
I don't feel strongly one way or the other. It is a little clunky to have a bunch of If you prefer bare function names, that's fine and I'll update this PR tonight. |
Because of the SAPM group of functions, I'd prefer full paths. It's clunky but explicit. |
wholmgren
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok, then I suggest merging as is. We can take up library-wide consistency in another issue.
|
Thanks @kanderso-nrel! |
Just a simple sphinx docs PR.