Skip to content

docs: include Softium LLC in copyright notices - #3

Merged
purpshell merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/copyright-softium-20261029
Oct 29, 2026
Merged

purpshell merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/copyright-softium-20261029

Conversation

@purpshell

@purpshell purpshell commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds Softium LLC alongside Polymorfa in the existing 2026 MIT copyright notice, preserving the year and every byte of the license grant/warranty. Copies that same notice into both skill source directories so the genuine existing builder includes it in distributed skill payloads. No manifest license ID, upstream attribution, skill instructions, producer logic or runtime code changes.

Head 7d203bdfb4e974b0140690729a541a32e695b997, based on accepted main d5e5b8f684efafd4db69be7054b01cdbe813fa88. Paths: LICENSE, skills/polymorfa/LICENSE, skills/polymorfa-webhooks/LICENSE, and the source/impact checkpoint.

Focused standard-wrapper proof: existing validator and all six builder regressions pass on an exact source copy. Actual generated index entries include LICENSE; emitted notices equal source bytes; both SKILL.md files are unchanged. Root MIT text differs only by (Softium LLC). Original ignored build/cache bytes and old source/index are preserved. No install or broad suite ran.

Hosted CI passed on this exact head: the validator regenerated and checked the skill index, and all six unittest regressions passed. Release independently verified the four-path notice change, unchanged MIT terms and exact distributed-notice bytes. CodeRabbit was skipped and is not an approval. Merged as 5c65db2a1eb0f641136e29dbcdb399eafaa7030c; ordered parents and the exact tested tree were verified after merge. This draft grants no legal approval, registry/package/tag release, native-client acceptance, installed-package update or Docs endpoint deployment. API/SDK/CLI/Docs/Admin and ZK/QuickLink/tunnel implementation remain unchanged; full assessment is in the checkpoint. Release alone merges.


View with [code]smith Autofix with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@purpshell
purpshell marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2026 20:32
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-29T20:34:05.110710Z 7d203bd Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-29T20:34:30.124953Z 7d203bd Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@purpshell
purpshell merged commit 5c65db2 into main Oct 29, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant