Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-authored-by: RayStick <50215726+RayStick@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: isesteves <24605642+isesteves@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sarah Goodale <60117796+goodalse2019@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: m-miedema <39968233+m-miedema@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Small note - the automatic release on Majormod would bump version to 2025, while we need to release at 2026.0.0. I'd suggest a manual release for this. |
Okay thanks - removed the |
mrikasper
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great work! I have a couple of comments, which I am happy to provide change requests/commits myself, but I didn't want to slow down the process here and was not sure whether you preferred to have comments first or accompany them by change suggestions right away.
None of my comments are major concerns, therefore: approved!
Co-authored-by: Lars Kasper <Lars.Kasper@utoronto.ca>
As suggested by Lars and Marie-Eve
Co-authored-by: Lars Kasper <Lars.Kasper@utoronto.ca>
Wording changes from Lars
As suggested by Lars
Rewording suggestion from Molly and Lars
Add example suggested by Lars
Clarity added, as suggested by Lars
As suggested in this thread: #24 (comment)
Mention of whole time-series as suggested by Molly
Co-authored-by: Marie-Eve Picard <marie-eve.picard.2@umontreal.ca>
Co-authored-by: Lars Kasper <Lars.Kasper@utoronto.ca>
Clarify the quality assurance, quality assessment and quality control terminology as per Roza's suggestion
|
We have resolved all the comments (either made corrections to the text or added them as Issues under this milestone: https://github.com/physiopy/physiopy-community-practices/milestone/1). As every reviewer approved the changes, and none of the latest edits were too substantial, I am merging these changes now. Next steps (after the merge) will be:
|
The QA/QC community practices section is ready for a first review round 🎉
Context for reviewers the content of this document was sourced from community discussions on QA/QC during community best practices meetings. People contributing to these meetings (or the subsequent write up of the notes) have been tagged in this first review. A second review will go out to the wider community later. Any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
Closes #17
Proposed Changes
Change Type
bugfix(+0.0.1)minor(+0.1.0)major(+1.0.0)refactoring(no version update)test(no version update)infrastructure(no version update)documentation(no version update)otherChecklist before review