docs: require complete AI contributor PR template#6601
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 4 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR updates the pull-request template with structured LLM and parse-impact metadata, then aligns contributor documentation and AI prompts to require that template and canonical model and tier fields. ChangesPR guidance standardization
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:
- Around line 15-17: Update the default pull request template metadata section
containing “Model,” “Tier,” and “Thinking” to provide an explicit not-applicable
option for non-LLM contributors, while retaining the existing guidance for
AI-assisted submissions. Ensure contributors can complete the section truthfully
without providing fabricated Frontier model or thinking details.
In `@docs/AI-CONTRIBUTOR.md`:
- Around line 383-388: Update the embedded pull request template section in
AI-CONTRIBUTOR.md to match .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md exactly, especially
the parse-diff card-name requirements and Scope Expansion guidance; remove the
conflicting optional-evidence wording rather than maintaining a divergent
duplicate.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0854ec5b-1b90-4f38-9d2a-f1fa2e02d843
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdCONTRIBUTING.mdREADME.mddocs/AI-CONTRIBUTOR.md
Summary by CodeRabbit