[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-81639: External gateway: Remove routes for external gateway pods in terminating or not ready state#3107
Conversation
Signed-off-by: arkadeepsen <arsen@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 3d32558)
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@arkadeepsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81639, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (togarcia@redhat.com), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest-required |
4 similar comments
|
/retest-required |
|
/retest-required |
|
/retest-required |
|
/retest-required |
|
/verify by tonyskapunk |
|
/verified by tonyskapunk |
|
@tonyskapunk: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
e2e-aws-ovn-windows is failing as the original fix was only backported till 4.18. I have asked in the PR to backport the fix till 4.17 as well. |
|
openshift/windows-machine-config-operator#3935 merged /test e2e-aws-ovn-windows |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@arkadeepsen have you run go mod vendor with modules.txt changes ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No. It came as part of the cherrypick.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ran the go mod vendor and re-pushed again. Few lines got removed but did not impact the code that is being used.
Signed-off-by: arkadeepsen <arsen@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit d942a7d)
8a3c834 to
1fd26d3
Compare
|
@arkadeepsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81639, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (togarcia@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Add the verified label again as the code change was only in the imported code via vendor directory and that's also not in the execution path. /verified by @tonyskapunk |
|
@arkadeepsen: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest-required |
1 similar comment
|
/retest-required |
|
/retest-required |
|
@arkadeepsen: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: arkadeepsen, pperiyasamy The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/payload 4.17 ci blocking |
|
@pperiyasamy: trigger 4 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.17
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/c52f7e80-37d2-11f1-8e5b-cd5c5daf8551-0 trigger 8 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.17
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/c52f7e80-37d2-11f1-8e5b-cd5c5daf8551-1 |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.17-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade |
|
@arkadeepsen: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/6d25ffe0-37f8-11f1-9d07-3ab823bbb0f0-0 |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.17-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade |
|
@arkadeepsen: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/da5ba0b0-3816-11f1-8df5-363d71c5a41a-0 |
|
@pperiyasamy all the payload jobs have passed now. Can you please add the backport-risk-assessed label? |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
3f208c0
into
openshift:release-4.17
|
@arkadeepsen: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81639 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-81639 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira backport release-4.16,release-4.15,release-4.14 |
|
/cherrypick release-4.16 release-4.15 release-4.14 |
|
@arkadeepsen: #3107 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.16": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Fix included in release 4.17.0-0.nightly-2026-04-17-173830 |
Manual cherry pick of 3d32558 and d942a7d.
For 3d32558 resolved conflicts in:
go-controller/pkg/ovn/controller/apbroute/external_controller_pod.gogo-controller/pkg/ovn/egressgw.gogo-controller/pkg/ovn/ovn.gogo-controller/vendor/modules.txtThen ran
go mod tidyandgo mod vendorFor d942a7d resolved conflicts in:
go-controller/pkg/ovn/controller/apbroute/external_controller_pod_test.goAdditionally, for d942a7d fixed issue of imported packages and package names in:
go-controller/pkg/ovn/controller/apbroute/external_controller_pod_test.gogo-controller/pkg/ovn/controller/apbroute/external_controller_namespace_test.gogo-controller/pkg/ovn/egressgw_test.go